![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
This is from the memory FAQ
"an Athlon XP system will ALWAYS exhibit best performance running the memory in sync with the FSB. Therefore, a 166FSB Athlon XP would run synchronously with DDR333/PC2700 (2*166) and give better performance than running with DDR400/PC3200, despite its numbers being bigger. "
AND
"Why are you recommending PC3500, when my motherboard only supports PC3200?
Memory modules really have no fixed speed. Like the tire to a car, there is a "rating" on it. When a tire is rated to be 150mph, it means it can run as fast as 150mph maximum. It also means that it can run at any speed lower than that. It is also quite safe to say that the tire should also withstand at 160 mph, just not as "safe" according to the Government's test environment.
Memory is very much similar in this way. Many people ask if a PC3500 or PC3700 module would run/blow up/be compatible in a motherboard originally designed to use PC3200 or PC2700. The answer is, hell ya! JEDEC (the government) has only approved PC3200. This reason, coupled with the fact that no processor needs memory rated higher than PC3200, are causes for motherboard manufacturers not stating support for newer, faster modules. But higher rated speeds of DDR are always backward compatible so to speak, or capable of running at lower speeds. Older systems stand to gain from newer and faster modules. Even if they can't run the module at its top supported frequency, you can still tweak the timing parameters to maximize performance at lower clock speeds, that otherwise would not be possible with lower-rated modules."
So let me get this straight here, its saying that you are better off running with pc2700 memory if your running at 166MHZ, and the next paragraph is saying that the speed rating does not matter its only a rating. So what is right here?
So if I'm going to run my athlon at 200MHZ FSB, will my system run better with a PC3200 then a PC3500 (Assume same timings)?
"an Athlon XP system will ALWAYS exhibit best performance running the memory in sync with the FSB. Therefore, a 166FSB Athlon XP would run synchronously with DDR333/PC2700 (2*166) and give better performance than running with DDR400/PC3200, despite its numbers being bigger. "
AND
"Why are you recommending PC3500, when my motherboard only supports PC3200?
Memory modules really have no fixed speed. Like the tire to a car, there is a "rating" on it. When a tire is rated to be 150mph, it means it can run as fast as 150mph maximum. It also means that it can run at any speed lower than that. It is also quite safe to say that the tire should also withstand at 160 mph, just not as "safe" according to the Government's test environment.
Memory is very much similar in this way. Many people ask if a PC3500 or PC3700 module would run/blow up/be compatible in a motherboard originally designed to use PC3200 or PC2700. The answer is, hell ya! JEDEC (the government) has only approved PC3200. This reason, coupled with the fact that no processor needs memory rated higher than PC3200, are causes for motherboard manufacturers not stating support for newer, faster modules. But higher rated speeds of DDR are always backward compatible so to speak, or capable of running at lower speeds. Older systems stand to gain from newer and faster modules. Even if they can't run the module at its top supported frequency, you can still tweak the timing parameters to maximize performance at lower clock speeds, that otherwise would not be possible with lower-rated modules."
So let me get this straight here, its saying that you are better off running with pc2700 memory if your running at 166MHZ, and the next paragraph is saying that the speed rating does not matter its only a rating. So what is right here?
So if I'm going to run my athlon at 200MHZ FSB, will my system run better with a PC3200 then a PC3500 (Assume same timings)?