I have been considering water cooling for a long time, but always run into some barrier of some sort and never really get into it. Generally it seems the means doesn't justify the gains overall, and I end up sticking with air.
My question is partly due to maintenance. I know a lot of people say their systems are very low-maintenance (which is a significant plus). What about a system that regularly sits unused for short periods?
I travel a lot for work, and so quite often the system(s) would sit unused for a couple weeks at a time, and I am concerned that this might be detrimental to the systems, or incur much more maintenance that usual.
Does anyone have any experience with this? Can an efficient system be made to combat this, and if so is it any more worthwhile than sticking with good air cooling?
Because I'm gone a lot, I've considered going to a rack-mount setup for my systems (increased physical security). This of course introduces potential noise problems, where water cooling the whole rack may alleviate - but again, my concerns with leaving such a setup keep me from jumping on it.
Thanks all.
My question is partly due to maintenance. I know a lot of people say their systems are very low-maintenance (which is a significant plus). What about a system that regularly sits unused for short periods?
I travel a lot for work, and so quite often the system(s) would sit unused for a couple weeks at a time, and I am concerned that this might be detrimental to the systems, or incur much more maintenance that usual.
Does anyone have any experience with this? Can an efficient system be made to combat this, and if so is it any more worthwhile than sticking with good air cooling?
Because I'm gone a lot, I've considered going to a rack-mount setup for my systems (increased physical security). This of course introduces potential noise problems, where water cooling the whole rack may alleviate - but again, my concerns with leaving such a setup keep me from jumping on it.
Thanks all.
