heatlesssun
Extremely [H]
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2005
- Messages
- 44,154
I think he means that the OS doesn't make any use of the multitouch features. I also don't consider 2 finger to really represent multitouch because the only 2 finger gestures that work are scroll.
Perhaps. The thing is that most of the multi-touch gestures that were originally mentioned like backwards and forwards had already been implemented in XP and then expanded in Vista as directional flicks which in some cases are more natural than multi-touch, flicking backwards and forwards is VERY intuitive for instance. And there is one other systemwide multi-touch gesture for context menus.
But I guess even more intuitive than that is the fact that all of these touch features are actually supported on multi-touch screens. Using such devices everyday it's kind of hard to look at OS X as having better touch support overall at least. Not trying to start anything but I think anyone could see where I'm coming from. It would be like saying your phone has better multi-touch support, but you have to use separate track pad. Maybe with a conventional desktop or laptop it's better in OSX, but I think I have a valid point.