• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

M4 SSD prices vs M500

AP514

Limp Gawd
Joined
Feb 15, 2006
Messages
487
Why are the Crucial M4 prices so high ? were they that good compared to the NEW M500's ?

I remember buying a M4 256 for around $170..Now i see them for sale at $350+...NEWEGG.

So whats up ?
 
Why are the Crucial M4 prices so high ?

I assume production ended for the M4. Although I believe the M500 could be also cheaper because it uses higher density NAND chips.
 
The M4 was discontinued a long time ago. All that's left is a few small sellers trying to find someone dumb enough to buy it after reading 1 review from 4 years ago saying it was the best, or someone replacing one in a raid array or similar situation.
 
I assume production ended for the M4. Although I believe the M500 could be also cheaper because it uses higher density NAND chips.


This part would be my first assumption. Older drive using older, bigger, more expensive NAND densities. Although it will also be quickly approaching the EOL phase in which the price could fluctuate more or less than the newer drives.
 
All the ones for sale on newegg are from a third party seller called "Action packed" , just like you can find things on amazon that aren't sold by amazon often at crazy dumb prices...
 
Reminds me of previous generation RAM each time we go through a change....
 
To sum it up, the high price on the m4 is solely due to its obsolescence; the m500 is better in every way.

The m500 line isn't even the latest Crucial line, but the m550 line is almost unknown because the m500 line's prices are so low and it's good enough.
 
To sum it up, the high price on the m4 is solely due to its obsolescence; the m500 is better in every way.

The m500 line isn't even the latest Crucial line, but the m550 line is almost unknown because the m500 line's prices are so low and it's good enough.

Not true at all. The M500 was introduced not just as a replacement for the aging M4 but as a means of cutting production costs. It's not TLC, but it was Crucial/Micron's answer to the Samsung 840. There were tweaks all around, but the only very significant advantage the m500 had over the M4 was improved random IO. In multiple other metrics, an M4 of comparable capacity is faster. As m500 was the first production run of 20nm NAND, a case can certainly be made that the endurance is lower than the mature 25nm process in the M4.

The m500 had a glaring problem in the 120GB and 240GB models vs the 840/840 Evo though, thanks to the use of 128Gbit/die NAND that halved the number of channels between NAND and controller. This has been addressed with a few other tweaks on the m550 (back to 64Gbit/die NAND on 120GB and 240GB models) which makes these appreciably better than the m500. In fact, the 120GB m550 outperforms the 240GB m500. As for reliability, the Marvell controller is described as an updated version, so I'd assume basic operation has not changed. The low prices on the m500 are great for 480GB and 960GB models, but for anything less, the m550 is better no contest.
 
Oh well, looks like I was quite wrong; thanks for the detailed explanation!

The prices I see on amazon are $67 for the 120GB m500 vs $96 for the 128GB m550, and $120 for the 240GB m500 vs $164 for the 256GB m550. It seems to me that the smaller m500 models will remain popular for as long as they are that much cheaper than the m550 line. 30% off on the 120GB size is huge for those looking to spend as little as possible for an SSD and an OS upgrade from WinXP.
 
Back
Top