Nov 28, 2009 #1 G GMcDougal Gawd 2FA Joined Aug 22, 2004 Messages 938 only got 3483 with a 4890 at stock speeds...ran it at 1280x1024...all aa and af off. here are my system specs. anyone know why it might be so low? windows xp pro 32 bit athlon 7750 be 4 gigs 1066 g skill ram xfx 4890 at 850 core/ 975 memory
only got 3483 with a 4890 at stock speeds...ran it at 1280x1024...all aa and af off. here are my system specs. anyone know why it might be so low? windows xp pro 32 bit athlon 7750 be 4 gigs 1066 g skill ram xfx 4890 at 850 core/ 975 memory
Nov 28, 2009 #2 M MrLonghair [H]ard|Gawd Joined Jun 7, 2004 Messages 1,764 Because furmark is just a benchmark. Do your games work well?
Nov 28, 2009 #3 G GMcDougal Gawd 2FA Joined Aug 22, 2004 Messages 938 cod 4 and americas army 3 both run very smooth at 1680x1050 res with everything turned to max. maybe i just put too much thought into benchmarks....
cod 4 and americas army 3 both run very smooth at 1680x1050 res with everything turned to max. maybe i just put too much thought into benchmarks....
Nov 28, 2009 #4 M Mr. Pedantic [H]ard|Gawd Joined Sep 19, 2009 Messages 1,707 Does it really matter how furmark, or indeed, any other benchmark runs, as long as your games run smoothly and look good at the res that you play them at?
Does it really matter how furmark, or indeed, any other benchmark runs, as long as your games run smoothly and look good at the res that you play them at?
Nov 28, 2009 #5 N Nihilanth99 2[H]4U Joined Aug 28, 2002 Messages 3,564 As far as I remember, Catalyst gimps the card when Furmark is running to prevent it from incurring the board's overcurrent protection.
As far as I remember, Catalyst gimps the card when Furmark is running to prevent it from incurring the board's overcurrent protection.