I'm looking for a mass storage data/media/etc. drive. 2TB is about the right size for me. It won't be used to run programs or used too frequently - mostly movies, music, backups, etc. So speed isn't a concern as long as it's reasonable. Ideally I'd like to get one relatively cheaply.
So it would seem the WD Green drive is a good bet. $70, 2TB. But reports are that they don't last very long. Their idle park timer is set at 8 seconds which is stupidly low (all to shave a few watts off the system). That can be fixed but it's kind of a hassle. Makes me wonder if that's the reason for their low lifespan. I've also seen reports that they don't do normal error correction - instead of marking sectors as bad and reporting it to SMART, it instead just replies garbage data and acts like the sector isn't bad. Is there any truth to that?
I have had very good and reliable Hitachi Deskstars in the past, so the Toshiba 2TB drive that's essentially a Hitachi was appealing at $75, but the reviews report a whole lot of DOAs. Not sure why, since Hitachis used to be quite reliable.
WD Red I've seen recommended for reliability, but they're a bit pricey, and some of the things that make them suitable for RAID (low time for error recovery) make them worse for a regular standalone drive.
I could also consider an external drive. They go on sale pretty frequently so I could probably snag a 2TB external for a good price. Is it acceptable to run external drives connected to your computer 24/7? Do they have an acceptable lifetime when run that way? Are there any other downsides compared to an internal drive besides speed?
So it would seem the WD Green drive is a good bet. $70, 2TB. But reports are that they don't last very long. Their idle park timer is set at 8 seconds which is stupidly low (all to shave a few watts off the system). That can be fixed but it's kind of a hassle. Makes me wonder if that's the reason for their low lifespan. I've also seen reports that they don't do normal error correction - instead of marking sectors as bad and reporting it to SMART, it instead just replies garbage data and acts like the sector isn't bad. Is there any truth to that?
I have had very good and reliable Hitachi Deskstars in the past, so the Toshiba 2TB drive that's essentially a Hitachi was appealing at $75, but the reviews report a whole lot of DOAs. Not sure why, since Hitachis used to be quite reliable.
WD Red I've seen recommended for reliability, but they're a bit pricey, and some of the things that make them suitable for RAID (low time for error recovery) make them worse for a regular standalone drive.
I could also consider an external drive. They go on sale pretty frequently so I could probably snag a 2TB external for a good price. Is it acceptable to run external drives connected to your computer 24/7? Do they have an acceptable lifetime when run that way? Are there any other downsides compared to an internal drive besides speed?