Let's say you were building a PC for an end of the world as we know it scenario. The main goal of this PC would be to last you as long as possible. To store records, documents, books (survival guides, instructions, entertainment etc). You may play some light open source/indie games, but I don't think it would be practical to build this PC to use a modern powerful graphics card. You may also use it for communication over some sort of wireless network if other survivors also have the capability.
Requirements:
* Very low power consumption (if you have to ride a stationary bike to generate power, or find fuel you don't want to have a PC drawing 700W)
* Very high reliability
* 1,000$ seems like a good price to shoot for since most people may be able to afford it. Don't forget to include some spare parts.
* 30 years. Seems like a reasonable benchmark to shoot for in terms of longevity. We all know someone who has a PC working that's 10 years old or so, but 30 seems like a good challenge.
So what approach would you take to making this happen?
If I was actually trying to build a desktop PC, I think I would go with the lowest wattage Intel processor I could find, likely a dual core with on-die graphics. I would get a very efficient, quality power supply that would probably only be using a small amount of its rated output. I would make sure the entire case was well sealed with dust filters. A quality UPS would also be essential.
The motherboard is a very scary issue that I feel would be difficult to get right, since there's no way to verify the motherboard will be long lasting. I would just try to spend a little more and find a motherboard with high quality capacitors and other components, and hope for the best.
For storage, I would probably use small SSDs and just have several spares on hand. I would need at least 2 installed SSDs for redundancy, with 2 for spares. I know they don't have the long term track record of hard drives, but I think the lack of moving parts is also critical.
All that being said, buying a a few rasberry pis or similar devices sounds very appealing. It would be cheap, and you could have a pretty redundant setup. You could simply backup your data to a secondary rasberry pi daily. Of course you would give up a great deal in computing power.
I'd like to hear ALL the suggestions for this idea
Requirements:
* Very low power consumption (if you have to ride a stationary bike to generate power, or find fuel you don't want to have a PC drawing 700W)
* Very high reliability
* 1,000$ seems like a good price to shoot for since most people may be able to afford it. Don't forget to include some spare parts.
* 30 years. Seems like a reasonable benchmark to shoot for in terms of longevity. We all know someone who has a PC working that's 10 years old or so, but 30 seems like a good challenge.
So what approach would you take to making this happen?
If I was actually trying to build a desktop PC, I think I would go with the lowest wattage Intel processor I could find, likely a dual core with on-die graphics. I would get a very efficient, quality power supply that would probably only be using a small amount of its rated output. I would make sure the entire case was well sealed with dust filters. A quality UPS would also be essential.
The motherboard is a very scary issue that I feel would be difficult to get right, since there's no way to verify the motherboard will be long lasting. I would just try to spend a little more and find a motherboard with high quality capacitors and other components, and hope for the best.
For storage, I would probably use small SSDs and just have several spares on hand. I would need at least 2 installed SSDs for redundancy, with 2 for spares. I know they don't have the long term track record of hard drives, but I think the lack of moving parts is also critical.
All that being said, buying a a few rasberry pis or similar devices sounds very appealing. It would be cheap, and you could have a pretty redundant setup. You could simply backup your data to a secondary rasberry pi daily. Of course you would give up a great deal in computing power.
I'd like to hear ALL the suggestions for this idea