June 21, nVidia Next Gen Video Card Launch?

Skrying said:
Sorry bud, but you are totally totally wrong. 512MB of RAM is not enough,

Sure it is.Win95 doesn't need anymore than 512MB of RAM. ;)
 
Krycek1 said:
No, 1 gig of ram is overrated for playing games and I really like to be efficient and get maximum bang for the buck. I've done plenty of research and 512mb is nearly as effective as 1 gig in most high resolution games including Battlefield 2 and DOOM 3.

http://hardware.gamespot.com/Story-ST-x-2147-x-x-x&body_pagenum=5

http://anandtech.com/guides/showdoc.aspx?i=2156&p=2
I agree with everyone else. 512 is most certainly not enough anymore and there is even emerging evidence that 1GB is no longer enough. For my new rig next year I am seriously considering 2GB of PC2 4200.
 
I know I will be getting one 7800GTX. I think SLI is overrated and dont think for what I do I will ever need it, Since my monitor will not do more than 1280x1024. And I hate Anti Alising, I think I will be ok with 1 GTX.

My 9700Pro is still good though, but I think she needs to be layed to rest.
 
I can't blame you for wanting to get your hands on the latest tech. I've always wanted too, but never had the money. So I settle for midrange.

Running a Venice 3000@2.4GHz and a 6600GT PCI-E in WIndows XP64 playing Far Cry with 2Gb of RAM is still an awesome experience, though. At 1024x768@100Hz with high settings, there's no chugging or choppiness.
 
Skrying said:
BF2 is not that hard on the video card alone. Its a system killer. It smoothes out more with system memory than video memory once you get to the 256MB point with a video card. But if you only have 512MB of system memory you are still going to get tons of chopiness.


The original poster needs to listen to what this man is saying. I think several people in this thread have said it already More memory WILL give you a MUCH MUCH better gaming excperience than a new graphics card.

As for a matching stick, who said it needs to match? You can buy a 512 stick of DDR400 Corsair memory on the egg for $39.85
 
USMC2Hard4U said:
I know I will be getting one 7800GTX. And I hate Anti Alising, I think I will be ok with 1 GTX.
Spend $500 on a video card and hate AA?? :confused:
 
OrionNT said:
Spend $500 on a video card and hate AA?? :confused:
I think AA is pretty stupid. Get rid of the "jaggies" which I dont notice anyway. When I play fast paced games I dont care how the wall or celing look, if they are jagged or not, of course they will its a computer game, But I just want ultimate smoothness so I can kill that bastard before he shoots me.

I really dont care how the game looks as long as it runs good.

Plus, I will settle for no less than my max monitor res and absolute highest in game details. But I dont need FSAA and Ansicopic filtering to any other enhancements like that, I think its cool that they are their but not for me at all.
 
USMC2Hard4U said:
I think AA is pretty stupid. Get rid of the "jaggies" which I dont notice anyway. When I play fast paced games I dont care how the wall or celing look, if they are jagged or not, of course they will its a computer game, But I just want ultimate smoothness so I can kill that bastard before he shoots me.

I really dont care how the game looks as long as it runs good.

Plus, I will settle for no less than my max monitor res and absolute highest in game details. But I dont need FSAA and Ansicopic filtering to any other enhancements like that, I think its cool that they are their but not for me at all.

I agree about AA when you're at a high resolution. But I must have my AF. I LOVE AF and I must have it whenever possible.

Main reason? It helps me when aiming in games.

I'm a hardcore gamer (I play in leagues go to CPL tournments etc) and most of the time I play at max details 1024x768 with 2xAA and 16xAF. Its what works best for me. I cant go up to a high resolution or it makes heads to small and any lower and the jaggies do distract my eyes.

To each their own. My cousin loves to play without AA because for some reason he says with it on it makes the game feel "unnatural" to him.
 
USMC2Hard4U said:
I only use AF in Counter Strike. It seems to be the only game i can notice it on

Well I do play CS:S for my gaming fix! That and I've been having fun with the BF2 demo, but its kinda boring now.
 
Skrying said:
I cant go up to a high resolution or it makes heads to small
That is a complete myth that I proved was false two years ago.
 
Yea this isn't true. Play CS on 640x480 or 1680x1050... and take a ruler and the size of the head will be exactly the same.
 
n64man120 said:
Yea this isn't true. Play CS on 640x480 or 1680x1050... and take a ruler and the size of the head will be exactly the same.

I'll holy disgree, but oh well. It may be the same size, but it looks nowhere close to being the same size to me.
 
Skrying said:
I'll holy disgree, but oh well. It may be the same size, but it looks nowhere close to being the same size to me.
It's the same size. Your eyes tell you nothing apart from what people in random forums you read tell you.
 
Skrying said:
I'll holy disgree, but oh well. It may be the same size, but it looks nowhere close to being the same size to me.


lol if you're so concerned with easier headshots, instead of spending $500 more on a new videocard, spend 200 for this very nice refurbed 22in CRT i found on pricewatch. You'll cheese your pants with how big the heads are. :D

LMAO

https://www.azatek.com/details.asp?iid=603

edit: whoops it's a pull, not a refurb
 
SatinSpiral said:
lol if you're so concerned with easier headshots, instead of spending $500 more on a new videocard, spend 200 for this very nice refurbed 22in CRT i found on pricewatch. You'll cheese your pants with how big the heads are. :D

LMAO

https://www.azatek.com/details.asp?iid=603

edit: whoops it's a pull, not a refurb

I instead spent $300 on a nice LCD and $300 on a nice video card = yay fun.
 
Skrying said:
I instead spent $300 on a nice LCD and $300 on a nice video card = yay fun.

Yeah, I swear by my pixel-for-pixel sharpness on my 1801FP and i9300 17" LCDs... after using them I rather use my 1905FP and not play games than use my CRT for games!
 
Krycek1 said:
No, 1 gig of ram is overrated for playing games and I really like to be efficient and get maximum bang for the buck. I've done plenty of research and 512mb is nearly as effective as 1 gig in most high resolution games including Battlefield 2 and DOOM 3.

http://hardware.gamespot.com/Story-ST-x-2147-x-x-x&body_pagenum=5

http://anandtech.com/guides/showdoc.aspx?i=2156&p=2

OK buddy! Whatever you say. :p Battlefield 1942, Farcry, and UT2004 weren't night and day back then when I upgraded to 1GB. All my imagination!

Dude it's been gig time for months now. With prices at what they are at and the whoas of shitty clocking gig packs long gone... well you live in whatever world you want to.
 
Krycek1 said:
No, 1 gig of ram is overrated for playing games and I really like to be efficient and get maximum bang for the buck. I've done plenty of research and 512mb is nearly as effective as 1 gig in most high resolution games including Battlefield 2 and DOOM 3.

http://hardware.gamespot.com/Story-ST-x-2147-x-x-x&body_pagenum=5

http://anandtech.com/guides/showdoc.aspx?i=2156&p=2
"Once again, the numbers don't quite meet reality head on. While using our setup with 512MB, we experienced lots of chugging due to the large textures swapping between system memory and the hard drive."
From the first link. So basically... you post a link that contradicts what you say. Well, at least you did all the work for us when it comes to proving you wrong.
 
I am buying 2 gb of Geil RAM from newegg for 180 come thursday :D Newegg is about to get richer here on thursday:
Shuttle SN25P
A64 4000+ San Diego
2gb Geil DDR400 RAM
74 gig Raptor
Sapphire X850XT
NEC DVD Burner
Viewsonic VP191B

EDIT: thought about getting the 7800 GTX but size, heat, and power is my concern. Plus no dual slot pushing hot air out of the case action :(
 
Back
Top