i understand the arguments against this proposal, psycological reasons etc... but i will remind everyone that we are talking about convicted criminals here. the penal system has its faults, but basic law enforcement is logically very clear. if you break the law, you are penalized. everyone has free will and everyone can make the choice to NOT murder, to NOT steal, to NOT rape. those who choose to do so, against the law, are (or should reasonably be) completely aware of the consequences if they are caught, which include not being able to see your loved ones.
sixfoot- its unfortunate that your brother picked the choices that he did; its unfortunate that he was mugged and stabbed. but that doesnt change the fact that he chose to sell illegal drugs and be involved in that type of dangerous environment. he chose to kill those people (arguably in self defense, yes; but he was in that situation in the first place because of his own previous choices. he also had the choice between weather or not to pull the trigger, and he made his pick).
its like having sympathy for me for getting diabetes after i drink 6 liters of coke per day for the last 10 years, or feeling sorry for the guy who gets paralyzed from driving drunk and smashing his car into a tree. yea its an unfortunate situation to find yourself in, but you did that to yourself. perhapse not on purpose, but it was by your own hand. you now get to live with the consequences of your own actions.
What someone chooses to sell is none of the government's business unless they are committing fraud.
Drug related violence arises from prohibition. Just as alcohol prohibition resulted in the rise of the mafia, drug prohibition has allowed numerous criminal enterprises to gain power. To make matters worse, a lot of the violence comes not from the drug dealers but from the police whose supposed job is to "protect us".