ISO Comparisons Between Nikon D2X and D3

PS-RagE

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
Aug 11, 2000
Messages
4,298
One of the members of the photo club I am a member of asked for a high ISO photo with the D3 so I thought I would make some comparisons between the D3 and the D2X.

I set up a lead figurine approx 3cm tall and used apiece of orange construction paper as a scoop. The lighting is ambient (halogen).

The cameras were tripod mounted with a remote release using mirror up mode. A 60mm f2.8 micro was mounted and used in manual focus. Auto white balance. Aperture set to f13. Images are captured as RAW (12bit, compressed)

Once I had all my photos taken, the RAW data was batch processed in Nikon Capture NX2. The Picture Control settings are:
D2XMODE2
Sharpening = 0
Contrast = 0
Brightness = 0
Saturation = 0
Hue = 0

Noise Reduction
Color Noise Reduction
Intensity = 0
Sharpness = 5
Method = Better Quality

The processed images were then exported to PhotoShop CS4. I used the Marquee Tool to select portion of image and drag to new frame. I then changed the Mode to 8 bit, the image was resized to 1024 pixels across (bicubic). The section dragged off was brought back into the image to show 100% crop view. Finally, the picture was flattened and an Unsharp mask was applied (Amount = 120%, Radius = 0.9 pixels, Threshold = 0 levels). Image saved as JPG level 10.

No effort was made in any of the images to clean up the noise other than changing the default setting for Noise Reduction from "faster" to "better quality"

In hindsight, I should have used the right angle finder in 2x mode to find an exact focus point. As you'll notice, the images from the D3 are focused a little further back than the D2X.

D2X ISO100.jpg

D2X at ISO 100 (this is the D2X's base ISO)

D3 ISO100.jpg

D3 at ISO 100 (base ISO -1EV)

.

D2X ISO200.jpg

D2X at ISO 200

D3 ISO200.jpg

D3 at ISO 200 (this is the D3's base ISO)

.

D2X ISO400.jpg

D2X at ISO 400

D3 ISO400.jpg

D3 at ISO 400

.

D2X ISO800.jpg

D2X at ISO 800

D3 ISO800.jpg

D3 at ISO 800

.

D2X ISO1600.jpg

D2X at ISO 1600

D3 ISO100.jpg

D3 at ISO 1600

.

D2X ISO3200.jpg

D2X at ISO 3200 (this is as far as the D2X goes - probably just as well)

D3 ISO3200.jpg

D3 at ISO 3200

.

D3 ISO6400.jpg

D3 at ISO 6400

D3 ISO12800.jpg

D3 at ISO 12800

D3 ISO25600.jpg

D3 at ISO 25600

.

Just for fun, I cleaned up the 25600 shot a bit. Pretty impressive

D3 ISO25600 cleaned.jpg
 
nice. 12800 on D3 looks better then 3200 on D2x, lol. congrats once again on a great camera!
 
nice. 12800 on D3 looks better then 3200 on D2x, lol. congrats once again on a great camera!

I think that's the main flop with the d2 sensor. It uses the older ccd sensor instead of the cmos. The former is really bad with noise any ISO above 400.
 
Makes me want a D700 now but, the economy has really put a cure to my NAS.
 
I believe it was Gordon Geeko who said "NAS, for lack of a better word, is GOOOOOOOD!"
 
Thanks for the comparison. It reminds me a little of when I had a D700. But I think yours are a little better. That's amazing the difference between those generations.
 
I figure the difference is a little better than three stops (compare D2X at 400 to D3 at 3200).

Easily 95% of my photos with the D2X are at ISO100. I will only rarely take it above 400 and now I shouldn't have to at all. The D2X has a CMOS sensor, BTW. It is just older technology and much smaller photosites (the FX sensor is more than twice the size of the DX).
 
For comparison I'd say I'll gladly take my D300 to 2500 without worry, 3200 when needed, and 6400 never.
 
Back
Top