Maybe I'm generally lucky (my stack of 3 dead Asus boards may disagree
), but I usually don't have problems with hardware. It's rare that I have bad hardware, and the relatively few times I did, I would just send it back for an RMA. Technical problems are even rarer, although that has been a mixed bag and the worst is the cause of this thread.
I'd like to think that maybe it's an isolated problem, but this has been going on for over 3 weeks and I must have managed to get the worst of the worst of evga's support (hi, e.a., c.g. and/or j.f. if you're reading!).
But let me start at the beginning. evga advertised a 8600GT 512MB (please note that the 8600GT part becomes important soon) at standard clock speeds. Unsurprisingly, the site I purchased the card from also verified the same specifications as evga advertised. Unfortunately, evga decided to sell a gimped card using the 8600GT name (using much slower 800MHz memory vs advertised and standard 1400MHz memory... not 800MHz DDR = 1600MHz effective, this has 400MHz DDR = 800MHz effective memory). When I found this out, I immediately contacted evga to try to get a solution. This is where it gets ugly.
Tech "a" (e.a.) simply referred me to tech "b" (j.f.) in an email. Why he couldn't simply forward my request is pretty dumb, but I did email j.f. as instructed. j.f. never wrote back. So around a week later, I contacted evga support again. This time tech "c" (c.g.) replied, promised that he would check with j.f. and send a BIOS that would fix the problem (nevermind that the memory was running at the speed the chips were rated at). I never received a response from tech c or tech b. Tech a was obviously smart enough to completely run away at the beginning.
So that leads up to today. As I was about to send my 4th support request, I checked up on the spec page for the card and magically the specs were changed to the lower speeds. evga silently "fixed" the problem after more than 2 weeks while completely ignoring my emails to support. I could understand if this were sold as a "8600GT SE/LE/gimped" version, but evga did the one thing that's probably the worst: misrepresenting a product, then not owning up to it/making it right.
The sad thing is that I am generally pretty satisified with evga. This experience with their (lack of) support is really disappointing.
I'd like to think that maybe it's an isolated problem, but this has been going on for over 3 weeks and I must have managed to get the worst of the worst of evga's support (hi, e.a., c.g. and/or j.f. if you're reading!).
But let me start at the beginning. evga advertised a 8600GT 512MB (please note that the 8600GT part becomes important soon) at standard clock speeds. Unsurprisingly, the site I purchased the card from also verified the same specifications as evga advertised. Unfortunately, evga decided to sell a gimped card using the 8600GT name (using much slower 800MHz memory vs advertised and standard 1400MHz memory... not 800MHz DDR = 1600MHz effective, this has 400MHz DDR = 800MHz effective memory). When I found this out, I immediately contacted evga to try to get a solution. This is where it gets ugly.
Tech "a" (e.a.) simply referred me to tech "b" (j.f.) in an email. Why he couldn't simply forward my request is pretty dumb, but I did email j.f. as instructed. j.f. never wrote back. So around a week later, I contacted evga support again. This time tech "c" (c.g.) replied, promised that he would check with j.f. and send a BIOS that would fix the problem (nevermind that the memory was running at the speed the chips were rated at). I never received a response from tech c or tech b. Tech a was obviously smart enough to completely run away at the beginning.
So that leads up to today. As I was about to send my 4th support request, I checked up on the spec page for the card and magically the specs were changed to the lower speeds. evga silently "fixed" the problem after more than 2 weeks while completely ignoring my emails to support. I could understand if this were sold as a "8600GT SE/LE/gimped" version, but evga did the one thing that's probably the worst: misrepresenting a product, then not owning up to it/making it right.
The sad thing is that I am generally pretty satisified with evga. This experience with their (lack of) support is really disappointing.