Until now, Macs have always been more expensive hardware-wise, but
this has been offset by the fact that they tend to hold their value much better than Wintel machines.
So.. when it comes time to upgrade, you can sell the old Mac and apply that to the cost of the new one.
I think this was because the Mac hardware was more rare, in terms of market share.
Now that Macs and Wintel use essentially the same hardware (Dell and Acer and others have Core Duo notebooks), how will Macs
hold their value? In 3 years, will a 2.0GHz Core Duo notebook be worth anything? If the price on used Wintel notebooks falls through the floor (as they tend to do) won't the same happen
for a Macbook that is essentially the same hardware?
Maybe so, but as of now the up-front price of a Macbook is on par with a Wintel notebook. So the initial cost is comparable (it can be argued that the cost of ownership of the Wintel notebook will be higher) even though resale will be about the same down the road as well.
Is that the trade-off then? Macs become more affordable, in terms of bang for buck, but they won't hold their value as much as they have been known to.
In 2 years, a Quad G5 will probably still be worth a lot of money... but an Intel based Power Mac won't be worth significantly more than a used Wintel box containing the same hardware.
In fact they will be highly sought after, like the G4 cubes.
Are we trading resale value for lower up-front cost? Discuss.
this has been offset by the fact that they tend to hold their value much better than Wintel machines.
So.. when it comes time to upgrade, you can sell the old Mac and apply that to the cost of the new one.
I think this was because the Mac hardware was more rare, in terms of market share.
Now that Macs and Wintel use essentially the same hardware (Dell and Acer and others have Core Duo notebooks), how will Macs
hold their value? In 3 years, will a 2.0GHz Core Duo notebook be worth anything? If the price on used Wintel notebooks falls through the floor (as they tend to do) won't the same happen
for a Macbook that is essentially the same hardware?
Maybe so, but as of now the up-front price of a Macbook is on par with a Wintel notebook. So the initial cost is comparable (it can be argued that the cost of ownership of the Wintel notebook will be higher) even though resale will be about the same down the road as well.
Is that the trade-off then? Macs become more affordable, in terms of bang for buck, but they won't hold their value as much as they have been known to.
In 2 years, a Quad G5 will probably still be worth a lot of money... but an Intel based Power Mac won't be worth significantly more than a used Wintel box containing the same hardware.
In fact they will be highly sought after, like the G4 cubes.
Are we trading resale value for lower up-front cost? Discuss.