- Joined
- Jun 15, 2005
- Messages
- 2,731
![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
-
Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.
Intel discrete graphics card
- Thread starter learners permit
- Start date
What's even more interesting is that the Xe HPG is pitted next to the AMD Radeon RX 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 (which compare to the RX 5500 XT and GTX 1660 Super from the current-gen).
Is that part true ?, GTX 680 is a 2012 card, they do not seem close at all:
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-680-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1660S-Super/3148vs4056
Are they talking about mobile GTX 1660 super ?
The gap between the RX 580 and the GTX 680 is big enough to make the co listing not that telling.
Is that part true ?, GTX 680 is a 2012 card, they do not seem close at all:
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-680-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1660S-Super/3148vs4056
Are they talking about mobile GTX 1660 super ?
The gap between the RX 580 and the GTX 680 is big enough to make the co listing not that telling.
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2011
- Messages
- 10,165
There is no way a 680 is ANYWHERE close to the 1660 super.
The 680 is as fast as the 770 (same chip)
The 770 is around the same speed of the 960
The 960 is roughly on-par with a 1050 non-Ti
the 1050Ti gets its ass handed to it by the RX570
The RX570 is 20% slower than the RX580
The RX 580 gets embarrassed by the 1660 non-super.
The 1660 Super is about 20% faster than the 1660.
Edit: Its possible they meant "980" as the 980 is roughly equivalent to a 1060
The 680 is as fast as the 770 (same chip)
The 770 is around the same speed of the 960
The 960 is roughly on-par with a 1050 non-Ti
the 1050Ti gets its ass handed to it by the RX570
The RX570 is 20% slower than the RX580
The RX 580 gets embarrassed by the 1660 non-super.
The 1660 Super is about 20% faster than the 1660.
Edit: Its possible they meant "980" as the 980 is roughly equivalent to a 1060
Not really, the GTX 680 is about the same as a GTX 1050 Ti.
The GTX 1050 Ti is quite a bit slower than the RX 580 (which is slightly faster than the GTX 1060 6GB). The logical conclusion one can come with these GPU requirements is that either the game is heavily biased towards Nvidia or the person who wrote the requirements has little idea what they're doing.
You are saying the exact same it seem.
The orignal quote was GTX 680 ~ GTX 1050 (non-Ti)