Inquirer Reviews 2900XT

Why do people link to that site?

Whats up with the huge resolutions beating out the lower ones on the card?

2560x1600 is FASTER than 1600x1200? Riiggghhtt

FPS almost doubles in Stalker @ 1600x1200 when its OCed? Yet at 1920x1200 its faster.

Looks like nothing but ♥♥♥ to me.
 
Why do people link to that site?

Whats up with the huge resolutions beating out the lower ones on the card?

2560x1600 is FASTER than 1600x1200? Riiggghhtt

FPS almost doubles in Stalker @ 1600x1200 when its OCed? Yet at 1920x1200 its faster.

Looks like nothing but ♥♥♥ to me
Click to expand...

As they stated in their review it looks like a driver issue, honestly do you think if your giving a card love you would show some crazy resolutions at super high levels (of which most people do not have that size of a monitor) or show super high frame rates on lets say 19" monitors? Come on use your brain a little here :), obviously these are more likely the result of a driver problem and hopefully it will be fixed soon so people can decide whether to buy this card or not.

I think the review gave a over decent light on the card, by saying it could be good, but it suffers from problems and hopefully (key word here) will be fixed in coming driver releases. I am sure ATI is working on the drivers as we speak so they can get some better reviews than what press they are getting now. I am on the fence as to which card to get, the wait and see attitude has always done well so I will stick with it, if the new drivers do not improve this card in a few weeks its the GTX for me :).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top