I’m a PC, And I’m A Mac-stoner

LOL at people saying he is acting. There is smoke coming out of that bong and his mouth. Anyone ever try to smoke tobacco out of a bong? Next some one will pop in and say "It was probably wizard smoke man!" :D

Either way, it doesn't matter. It amazes me more that someone found this and wrote an editorial. It just shows that most people haven't a clue what the fuck is important.

The facts are:
The guy pretended or actually did smoke weed in a funny skit.
Should I get out my giant wooden cross and dry thatch now or can we reserve that for other more serious criminals, like the guy who goes around ripping off vending machines.
 
What is the big deal over this
The guy made a funny skit, with other people i've seen acting before, its not like a skit in his friends' basement while they were actually high and drunk or whatever
I can't see this doing any damage to apple at all
 
DeadSkull said:
Preppy potheads and elitists druggies are the core market for Apples iProducts aren't they?
Click to expand...
Haha! Dead on, potheads/hippies/a combo of both, and of course cafe dwellers, which are at times potheads and/or hippies.
 
That was hilarious. Nothing wrong with weed, lighten up guys, I know lots of successful undercover stoners, you do too...but you might not know it. I know several physicians assistants, successful business owners, firefighters, both electrical and mechanical engineers, people in construction management jobs (I have no idea what their job title is), and many others who smoke occasionally but obviously keep it a secret to avoid persecution.

Just look at Washington...Clinton, Bush, Obama...
 
redman223 said:
That was hilarious. Nothing wrong with weed, lighten up guys, I know lots of successful undercover stoners, you do too...but you might not know it. I know several physicians assistants, successful business owners, firefighters, both electrical and mechanical engineers, people in construction management jobs (I have no idea what their job title is), and many others who smoke occasionally but obviously keep it a secret to avoid persecution.

Just look at Washington...Clinton, Bush, Obama...
Click to expand...

One of my friends works at a hospital and he said if they started doing drug tests half the doctors, nurses, etc. would be fired! :p
 
Its funny, but sad at the same time. Seems like the better your job, especially ones that require degrees, the less chance of getting random drug tested, I wonder why that is...

Usually its just a single test when you get hired, so common sense would say to stop smoking while you are job hunting, otherwise you are just dumb, cant blame weed on that one.
 
redman223 said:
That was hilarious. Nothing wrong with weed, lighten up guys, I know lots of successful undercover stoners, you do too...but you might not know it. I know several physicians assistants, successful business owners, firefighters, both electrical and mechanical engineers, people in construction management jobs (I have no idea what their job title is), and many others who smoke occasionally but obviously keep it a secret to avoid persecution.

Just look at Washington...Clinton, Bush, Obama...
Click to expand...

I don't even drink coffee or soda, let alone alcohol, weed, cocaine, crack, meth, whatever, but yeah, weed is completely harmless. Its a hell of a lot less harmful than alcohol is from a physiological and addiction standpoint. It should be allowed to be sold and taxed like every other controlled substance in this country.

The fact that tax dollars are spent fighting what is a harmless drug is IMHO completely fucking ridiculous.
 
LOL, don't think it is going to matter. Just look at the part he played in "Strange Wilderness." I say that it was a Meizu M8 he was using, not an iPhone!
I smoked some weed the other night, and I think this shit was laced, because I went out right away and got these tattoos on my eyelids to make it look while I was sleeping that people would think I was awake.
Click to expand...
Oh shit, a porcupine! [when his character sees a snake in a tree branch]
Click to expand...
 
what the fuck.

i honestly didnt even notice he was holding an iphone even after blindly reading the headline of the link. when i clicked i thought i was going to see a video about him being a pothead while dissing apple shit... but instead i just laughed my ass off.

if apple thinks this will hurt their rep in ANY way they are retarded. the worst that could come of this would be for apple to do anything about it. its free advertising they really should stop their bitchin.
 
SelousSizzle said:
It's 2009, Apple won't fire him as this is the year we find out Steve Jobs' health problems and chronic weight loss are due to an extreme marijuana addiction.
Click to expand...

They can this guy then Jobs has to go on medical marijuana

he might be trying to lose the endorsement anyway. lots of actors get fucked into bad typecasts/characters, so they blow there contract by doing shit like this.
 
redman223 said:
Its funny, but sad at the same time. Seems like the better your job, especially ones that require degrees, the less chance of getting random drug tested, I wonder why that is...

Usually its just a single test when you get hired, so common sense would say to stop smoking while you are job hunting, otherwise you are just dumb, cant blame weed on that one.
Click to expand...

No, but you can blame stupid, jackass, hypocritical politicians and uptight old people.
 
Serpico said:
I don't even drink coffee or soda, let alone alcohol, weed, cocaine, crack, meth, whatever, but yeah, weed is completely harmless. Its a hell of a lot less harmful than alcohol is from a physiological and addiction standpoint. It should be allowed to be sold and taxed like every other controlled substance in this country.

The fact that tax dollars are spent fighting what is a harmless drug is IMHO completely fucking ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Why should cannabis be specially taxed? Or alcohol? You do know what a sin tax is right?
 
Kristofff said:
Why should cannabis be specially taxed? Or alcohol? You do know what a sin tax is right?
Click to expand...

I should have clarified. If legalized, marijuana will be treated by our government as a regulated substance, period. Just like alcohol, just like tobacco. What I'm saying is that it should be treated similarly to other controlled (and IMHO more dangerous) substances, not lumped in with other dangerous drugs like meth, crack cocaine, etc that are actually very dangerous and will get you in trouble with the law.

Whether a sin tax is "right" is another discussion. I just don't think marijuana should be treated as harshly as it currently is under the law based on how a benign substance it actually is relative to those that are actually legal and currently taxed and regulated, that's all.
 
Serpico said:
I should have clarified. If legalized, marijuana will be treated by our government as a regulated substance, period. Just like alcohol, just like tobacco. What I'm saying is that it should be treated similarly to other controlled (and IMHO more dangerous) substances, not lumped in with other dangerous drugs like meth, crack cocaine, etc that are actually very dangerous and will get you in trouble with the law.

Whether a sin tax is "right" is another discussion. I just don't think marijuana should be treated as harshly as it currently is under the law based on how a benign substance it actually is relative to those that are actually legal and currently taxed and regulated, that's all.
Click to expand...

I still don't understand why you think it needs to be taxed as a "controlled substance" in the first place.
 
Why would people pay taxes on something they can hide and grow/make themselves? What would you do, on your tax form at the end of the year say you grew 20 marijuana plants and manufactured 12 grams of crystal meth? ahaha, yeah, like you're going to do that and raise your own taxes. Then of course we'd have to make government even bigger to "regulations". Ah, our tax dollars hard at work. More government assholes to pay from my paycheck. Do you guys realize if you all strived for smaller government in the first place, we might have more freedoms such as your beloved chemical dependencies? Why is it 'we must grow government bigger and create new regulations and taxes for what are/were illegal substances'.? Man, I swear you're digging your own grave. It's now apparently clear why people vote the way they do. Socialist countries are looking more tame as each day passes.
 
Kristofff said:
I still don't understand why you think it needs to be taxed as a "controlled substance" in the first place.
Click to expand...

I didn't say it needs to, I said that that is what the government would do as it would almost certainly be a controlled substance. Big difference.

w1retap said:
Ah, our tax dollars hard at work. More government assholes to pay from my paycheck. Do you guys realize if you all strived for smaller government in the first place, we might have more freedoms such as your beloved chemical dependencies? Why is it 'we must grow government bigger and create new regulations and taxes for what are/were illegal substances'.? Man, I swear you're digging your own grave. It's now apparently clear why people vote the way they do. Socialist countries are looking more tame as each day passes.
Click to expand...

Yeah yeah, I voted Libertarian in 2004 too. :rolleyes: ;)

Completely missing what I'm saying. There's a difference in what I believe should happen and what is likely to happen.
 
Again, to be clear:

If cannabis is legalized, and ridiculously that seems to be a big if at the moment, it will be regulated and considered a controlled substance by the government, as and such it will be taxed just like tobacco and alcohol are. Period.

I'm not saying it should be this way, but considering that pot is currently lumped in with hard drugs like cocaine and heroin while substances more dangerous and addictive than it like alcohol and tobacco are actually legal, it will likely be considered that if it is ever made legal.

I'm not talking ideals or some fantasyland, just likelihoods given our reality.

There is a difference between my own opinion, which is that cannabis should not be illegal because it is such a harmless substance, and reality, which is that like it or not, it is considered a "hard drug", and if it is ever legalized it will be lumped in with "soft drugs" such as alcohol and tobacco, and it will be taxed by our government in the same way.

If there are any problems understanding this, I don't know where I can help you.
 
Serpico said:
Again, to be clear:

If cannabis is legalized, and ridiculously that seems to be a big if at the moment, it will be regulated and considered a controlled substance by the government, as and such it will be taxed just like tobacco and alcohol are. Period.

I'm not saying it should be this way, but considering that pot is currently lumped in with hard drugs like cocaine and heroin while substances more dangerous and addictive than it like alcohol and tobacco are actually legal, it will likely be considered that if it is ever made legal.

I'm not talking ideals or some fantasyland, just likelihoods given our reality.

There is a difference between my own opinion, which is that cannabis should not be illegal because it is such a harmless substance, and reality, which is that like it or not, it is considered a "hard drug", and if it is ever legalized it will be lumped in with "soft drugs" such as alcohol and tobacco, and it will be taxed by our government in the same way.

If there are any problems understanding this, I don't know where I can help you.
Click to expand...

I guess the confusion came from where you plainly stated:

Serpico said:
It should be allowed to be sold and taxed like every other controlled substance in this country.
Click to expand...

I guess I missed the part where you stated all of the other stuff.
 
Sorry, I thought it was a foregone conclusion that legalizing cannabis would result in it moving from the "illegal hard substance" category into the "legal but controlled and regulated soft substance" category.

I just can't see it going from illegal to completely legal with absolutely no oversight from the government, not based on who's in charge, the huge amount of misinformation about it, and the stigma it has attached to it by people who don't know any better.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top