Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Criminal Infringement.
(1) In general. Any person who willfully infringes a copyright shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18, if the infringement was committed
(A) for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain;
(B) by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180-day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000; or
(C) by the distribution of a work being prepared for commercial distribution, by making it available on a computer network accessible to members of the public, if such person knew or should have known that the work was intended for commercial distribution."
i dont get it, ive seen people sued, they ignored everything, didnt show up to court, and nothing ever happened to them
For those curious about copyright infringement read the link...For those wondering/speaking out of their arse about the criminal aspect, read section 506.
Copyright Infringement
Have a good day.
LOL, whatever manFile sharing is one of those victimless crimes (IMO). Nobody get's hurt, yet the fines punishment is on par or worse than drug charges or assault charges.
i dont get it, ive seen people sued, they ignored everything, didnt show up to court, and nothing ever happened to them
yeah, if you stole a $3 energy drink from a convenience store (which is an actual real product that cannot be reproduced infinitely at zero cost), there's no way a court would fine you for $2,250.I would still like to know how a song is worth up to 750$ each when they retail for what a 1$ or so?
Cliffnotes?
I hope you were being facetious because a $2K fine for shoplifting a dollar item is not only realistic, but should be the least of one's concerns.yeah, if you stole a $3 energy drink from a convenience store (which is an actual real product that cannot be reproduced infinitely at zero cost), there's no way a court would fine you for $2,250.
yeah, if you stole a $3 energy drink from a convenience store (which is an actual real product that cannot be reproduced infinitely at zero cost), there's no way a court would fine you for $2,250.
Valve send us the news that their digital download service has proven rather popular.
During the past 12 months the platform had year-over-year new user growth of 178%, pushing the total number of active accounts to over 30 million, with over 1,200 games now offered. Peak simultaneous player numbers were also up to over three million, with over six million unique gamers accessing Steam each day.
In addition to new user growth, Steam sales during the trailing 12 months increased by more than 200%, putting it on track for a sixth straight year of realizing over 100% year-over-year growth in unit sales. To meet this demand, the Steam infrastructure has been increased and now has ability to run at 400Gps, enough bandwidth to ship a digitized version of the Oxford English Dictionary 92.6 times per second.
Six million unique users each day being the crucial fact there, fact fans. If youre one of those companies that says theres no market for PC games, well, the chances you were just doing something wrong.
__________________
You know the old saying:
"Don't do the crime if you aren't prepaired to do the time."
He did something illegal. He paid for it. Lesson learned.
I still hate the RIAA however.
Before going to trial he should have sold the car to a family member for $1.00.
Nobody reads articles anymore.Before going to trial he should have sold the car to a family member for $1.00.
There's a really easy way to not get sued by the RIAA - that's to not illegally download or distribute music on the internet.And this thread goes to show that the propaganda machine is alive and well.
Let's just stand back and watch it do it's thing.
The case didn't go to court. Again, nobody reads articles anymore.I don't wanna here this whiny propagandist bullshit.
The court would have put him on a payment plan if he didn't have money in hand, so the whiny little whore didn't have to sell his car.
I still don't see how he could have afforded gas or upkeep on it anyway, and anyway, if the kid was 16 would it not be his parents responisbility?
There's a really easy way to not get sued by the RIAA - that's to not illegally download or distribute music on the internet.
Hmm, either one of these might fit:How bad would this suck?
File sharing is one of those victimless crimes (IMO). Nobody get's hurt, yet the fines punishment is on par or worse than drug charges or assault charges.
Haha, that is true, people would.
what an idiot, i would have sold the mustang to a friend, hid the $ or spent it, let them sue me and then go bankrupt. especially at 16....god damn
There is a criminal side to file sharing, not just a civil side like some are saying.
He got sued for SHARING the fucking music, not for downloading it. UGH.
He didn't get sued.
i dont get it, ive seen people sued, they ignored everything, didnt show up to court, and nothing ever happened to them
4. You guys that are arguing that he didn't do anything wrong are just as stupid.
4. You guys that are arguing that he didn't do anything wrong are just as stupid.