I wonder if the performance shown by the x800 is going to hold true against the 6800 once HL2 ships and both companies tweak their drivers for the final. If so I think that in the end I will end up going with ATi, as a) am a HL2 man not a D3 man, and b) expect more games to be based off the HL2 engine than the d3 engine.
I guess in the end they are both good cards, but I find it strange that the disparity between their performance on the two engines is so great. I know that ATi's openGL drivers blow, but why is the 6800 biting it so hard on the CS Source benchmark? Its funny how the camps have polarised, with the two most powerful fps game developers sitting firmly in the camp of one of the two most powerful gaming video card makers.
I hope this doesn't foreshadow a future of rigidly defined gaming camps where your vid cards are always weak on the competitors pet developers games.
What are the thoughts of you folk who switched cards after seeing the D3 reviews? Do you not care? Do you feel gipped by the two companies? Or do you think that nVidia will close the gap sufficiently on the HL2 engine to make it not matter?
I guess in the end they are both good cards, but I find it strange that the disparity between their performance on the two engines is so great. I know that ATi's openGL drivers blow, but why is the 6800 biting it so hard on the CS Source benchmark? Its funny how the camps have polarised, with the two most powerful fps game developers sitting firmly in the camp of one of the two most powerful gaming video card makers.
I hope this doesn't foreshadow a future of rigidly defined gaming camps where your vid cards are always weak on the competitors pet developers games.
What are the thoughts of you folk who switched cards after seeing the D3 reviews? Do you not care? Do you feel gipped by the two companies? Or do you think that nVidia will close the gap sufficiently on the HL2 engine to make it not matter?