Can anyone help me out here? I've just picked up an Arescom NetDSL 800 router for my sins, and now I'm trying to get a route out the door. I've finally managed to get it to authenticate, and now I'm having more routing troubles. The routing table is currently configured as :
With it configured like this, I get absolutely no external traffic trying to ping anything (destination unreachable) except addresses in the 81.6.252.x range, where I get a request going out, but nothing coming back in (presumably because there's nothing on that address). Knowing absolutely zip about routing tables, I surmised that 0.0.0.0 with a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0 on the atmpvc0 interface (my external interface, by the looks of things) would do the trick, but I again got the fabled "destination host unreachable".
Anyone got any ideas what I'm doing wrong?
Code:
NetDSL>show ip route
show ip route
DEST_IP MASK GATEWAY INTERFACE M P F
192.168.0.254 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 loopback 1 255 0401
192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 loopback 1 255 2401
81.6.252.80 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 loopback 1 255 0401
81.6.252.255 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 loopback 1 255 2401
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 atmpvc0 1 0 1001
192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 ethernet0 1 255 0801
81.6.252.0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 atmpvc0 1 255 0801
0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 atmpvc0 1 0 1001
224.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 loopback 1 255 2401
With it configured like this, I get absolutely no external traffic trying to ping anything (destination unreachable) except addresses in the 81.6.252.x range, where I get a request going out, but nothing coming back in (presumably because there's nothing on that address). Knowing absolutely zip about routing tables, I surmised that 0.0.0.0 with a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0 on the atmpvc0 interface (my external interface, by the looks of things) would do the trick, but I again got the fabled "destination host unreachable".
Anyone got any ideas what I'm doing wrong?