Hard drive crashed in a Raid 0 setup

mikeblas said:
which sounds a lot like someone asserting there's no reason to run RAID0 for their storage drive, which is one of the two scenarios captured by the sentence that I wrote. Note that I didn't credit you with the unlimited assertion you've recollected.

But, look; you've again defended your LOGIC with condescending ad homenim attacks, and that's not productive for anyone. You're sure you're right and those who disagree can't comprehend what they read. That's obviously very empowering for you, so I'll get out of your way. Go with it!

Did I say that there was no reason to run a raid0 array at all? Did I not qualify what I said?

How exactly is that "unconstrained raid0 bashing?

And you also excused yourself from this thread a few posts ago...
 
If this sentence was on the OP's RAID array, it would have become:
Code:
If thi    ntene    on t   P's RA   ray, i  uld  h    ecome:

Seriously, two types of people in the world, those who backup their data, and those that are going to lose it. Choose wisely which you are.
 
This is precisely why RAID0 gets a bad name. It has a purpose and is DARN good at what it does. People need to THINK!
 
750gb of pr0n lost....what a shame!






Come on, was I the only one thinking this?!
 
Back
Top