Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, what are the risk with buying a ASUS TOP right now?
Should I wait for some kind of official comment from ASUS?
Don't know why anyone would consider a TOP card right now with all of the issues their having, the standard non-TOP DCII seems to be ok though, you get the same exact card but without the unreliable clock speeds. If you just have to have an Asus card, the non-TOP is the way to go right now.
Llama[Style];1038797316 said:I am supposed to receive my 7970 top today... after reading all these horror stories, it kind of has me worried. although, the 7970 ver was taken off of the market for a while and then put back on--hopefully they worked something out.
This is still really disheartening because i've owned a CU before and it always ran very cool--one of the factors i took when purchasing. I'll report back to let you know my findings.
(yes i know this is a nvidia flavor thread, but the dc2t version appears to have issues across both camps)
To shed some positive light here, I installed my Asus GTX 670 TOP on Friday and it's been running just fine. Now, I only ran Heaven for like 20min, but I've played D3 for hours and haven't had a single hiccup.
On a side note, the boost is supposed to go to 1137? MSI Afterburner shows it going as high as 1250 or so? Is this normal? (I am not O/C'ing..)
Good to hear a positive report on a TOP. There's definitely good TOP cards out there, it just seems like it's a bit of a dice roll right now if you'll get one of the good ones.
I believe 1250'ish is the max boost clock on the Asus TOP cards without overclocking. Keep in mind though that these cards will only boost to to max clock when needed. If a game isn't very demanding and the card realizes it can meet the target framerate using less clock speed, it will do that to save power. My 670 is overclocked to 1270MHz under boost but I noticed this weekend when playing GRID, it usually stay at the default 980MHz clock speed and that's becaue it keeps the framerates pegged at 60fps which is Vsync locked so its working properly. Pretty nice feature honestly to not use more power when it doesn't have to. I really wish AMD had a feature like this because its worth a lot more to me than adaptive Vsync. D3 isn't very demanding for a video card and it probably shouldn't need to boost to max clock speeds depending on what framerate you're trying to achieve. If you have Vync enabled, it shouldn't need to run full boost clocks. I have D3 but I honestly haven't checked my clock speeds while playing this game so I would need to verfiy if it boosts to full speed or not, but its hard to imagine it would need to.
I know of at least two people that have TOPs - myself and another - that boost to 1280 out of the box.
I also just talked to a co-worker who's having crashing issues on his Gigabyte OC 670 using out of the box clocks. So hopefully this isn't actually something endemic to the whole line of 670s (maybe some of these chips should have been held back for the 660 instead!).
I know of at least two people that have TOPs - myself and another - that boost to 1280 out of the box.
I also just talked to a co-worker who's having crashing issues on his Gigabyte OC 670 using out of the box clocks. So hopefully this isn't actually something endemic to the whole line of 670s (maybe some of these chips should have been held back for the 660 instead!).
The only cards that are having major issues right now are the Asus TOP cards and the former eVGA SC cards. All other card instabilities or failures are pretty low.
You are correct. Amazon will accept a defective video card and issue a full refund minus your shipping to send the card back to them. Their return policy is so much better than Newegg's policy.
played around 2 hours of Diablo and no crashes.
however I did experience stuttering in the game that I did not experience with my 6950. Or at least did not notice as much. I googled the issue and it seems that many 670/680 users are experiencing this same issue and are waiting for a driver release from Nvidia.
that's somewhat disappointing..
To be honest people are just more vocal about their issues. Normally people don't voice how great their purchase is and how everything is running fine. It's normally when issues arise. "80% of statistics are made up on the spot" is pretty spot on here. 50% are defective Blkout? Really? If it was that big of a problem there would have been a massive recall. Look at reviews on both Newegg and Amazon and the like. It seems roughly the Gigabyte OC and The Asus top are the ones with the most issues at the moment around ~20% defective (according to the reviews). To be honest I wouldn't hesitate getting either one. They are both excellent cards with great overclocking room. If you're weary, take a look at the MSI Twin Frozr IV that was just announced. People are speculating that the voltages are unlocked and paired with MSI's patented cooling system, I wouldn't be surprised if we saw overclocks over ~1400 on a regular basis. I am going to hold out for that card and see what they have to offer. In the mean time, hopefully Asus and Gigabyte figure out their issues.
13 people out of 29 total that have reviewed this card that have no issues...
44 people out of 60 total that have reviewed that card that have no issues...
Wake up!
Are you delusional? The Asus TOP 670 is sitting at Newegg right now with a 45% 5 star rating, that's only 13 people out of 29 total that have reviewed this card that have no issues. The Gigabyte 670 is sitting at Newegg right now with a 73% 5 star rating, that's 44 people out of 60 total that have reviewed that card that have no issues. I don't even know how you can compare these two and call it close? I guess you have some agenda to push so you blindly ignore the numbers presented to you. Looking at those numbers, I don't think my 50/50 estimate was too far off the mark. Gigabyte doesn't have any issues to figure out, Asus does though.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121638&Tpk=asus 670 DC2t
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125423&Tpk=gigabyte 670
Wake up!
Out of how many people that actually purchased the cards?
I think that's the point he's trying to drive at.
Also, please take it easy Mr. Limbaugh. We'll wake up when we're damned ready.
At least with eVGA you know you'll get good support if there's a problem. They made a mistake with the 670 SC model and quickly fixed it and gave everyone affected an upgraded card, for free. I can't say the same with Asus.
so is there high complains about the GTX 680 top edition also?
I've had these 2 pages open since three days and I still cant decide but I have to order one today
ASUS GTX680 DirectCU II TOP Edition
EVGA GeForce GTX680 SC SIGNATURE+
I know but I dont really care about the support because Im shipping this card outside the US (Local prices here are much higher than amazon)
Love my GTX 680 TOP. One of the best cards Ive owned. No stability issues here. I think its just the nature of the 670 chips to be so hit or miss.
I've had the Gigabyte and the Asus TOP at this point, and the Asus was definitely quieter, something I place a lot of value on.
I'm wondering if I should change my return to a refund and just shell out the extra dough to get a 680, if they are significantly more stable.
I ask you some legitimate questions and you continue to spew garbage. You should take a step back and think about why you even read and post on these forums.
Take it else where guys. These post will be deleted soon I'm sure.
Can't imagine the Asus being any quieter than my Gigabyte 670 which I can't even hear. That being said, I do believe the Asus fans spin slower, but that just makes the card run hotter. These cards will throttle clock speed above 70c which means you'll likely have to adjust your fan profile to run higher speed if you're overclocking which means more noise. My Gigabyte 670 runs 65c most of the time under full load at 1270MHz boost clock. Case cooling obviously will play a role in how hard your video card fans have to work as well.