Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
40% maybe?
4850 is about 30% slower than GTX 260... GTX 460 768 is probably 10-15% faster GTX 260.
overclocking is not a factor because overclocking is BIG YMMV> You do realize 4850 also overclocks.
If we started to account for overclocking performance there's no end to what clocks can be generated to compare to what card.
+1For the upper limits yes, but there are averages that tell the story.
You can check a dozen review sites, that do test for overclocking, and get an idea of what to expect. Usually you want to take their results and discount a bit.
In fact, the pre-OCed models tell the story too. Find the 5 best pre-OCed models of any said card, and that will give you a pretty good idea of what you can expect.
would you overclock the 460?? it wouldn't be passiveI don't have my 4850 OC'd because I am cooling it passively and they are already pretty hot cards.
BTW - resolution is 1600x1200. Main rig in signature.
For the upper limits yes, but there are averages that tell the story.
You can check a dozen review sites, that do test for overclocking, and get an idea of what to expect. Usually you want to take their results and discount a bit.
In fact, the pre-OCed models tell the story too. Find the 5 best pre-OCed models of any said card, and that will give you a pretty good idea of what you can expect.
Maybe, but not much. I want to balance performance, noise and heat as much as possible.
Alright well if you don't want him to get a 460 and OC it....Again overclocking is YMMV... as it's different from each card. 1 guy could be hitting 1000 and another guy barely break stock... It's silly to compare overclocked performance vs a stock card.
Now we should be comparing pre-overclocked cards vs factory cards?
I've seen 4850 topple near 4870 speeds so why don't you account for that? Oh right you only compare stock vs future overclocked cards.![]()