![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
OK, so I was reading an andtech article, and came across this. I would just like to clarify something as I have a 780i board, and it reads in mv not an actual voltage.
so based on the info below, I should be setting my GTL VREF's to 67% of my VTT.
my VTT is 1.4v
so 67% of 1.4v is 0.983
I converted 0.983 to mv by x 1000. After doing this I recieve the #
93.8mv
does that look like I did my math right?
so there are 4 GTL VREF's I know 2 are for core 0/1 and 2 for 0/1
Based on the notes it sounds liek I am supose to set all 4 to 95mw.
Does that sound right?
http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3283&p=18
This can get tricky though as each die receives two GTL reference voltages - one for the FSB Data Bus (running at the full FSB transfer rate) and one for the FSB Address Bus (running at half the FSB transfer rate). This means CPU GTL_REF0 Ratio is for the Core 0/1 Data Bus, CPU GTL_REF1 Ratio is for the Core 2/3 Data Bus, CPU GTL_REF2 Ratio is for the Core 0/1 Address Bus, and CPU GTL_REF3 Ratio is for the Core2/3 Address Bus. CPU GTL_REF2 Ratio and CPU GTL_REF3 Ratio will have no affect with a dual-core CPU installed, in which case CPU GTL_REF0 Ratio is for the Core 0/1 Data Bus and CPU GTL_REF1 Ratio is for the Core 0/1 Address Bus. As a rule, adjustments are normally made to FSB Data Bus values first. These lines are consistently heavily loaded and as such are more susceptible to the detrimental effects of reduced signaling margins.
Intel's GTL specification dictates that each reference voltage should be tightly controlled as 67% of the current VTT voltage (0.67 times CPU VTT Voltage). Typically, changes in VTT are automatically compensated with standard voltage divider circuits dedicated to the generation of each GTL reference voltage. Historical data has shown that dual-core CPUs (in particular 45nm dual-cores) often clock to higher FSB levels when the GTL reference values are closer to 63 ~ 64% of VTT while quad-core CPUs usually need the full strength value or even a little more voltage (67 ~ 70% of VTT).
As an exercise in the application of basic math, consider the following. With VTT at 1.10V, the GTL reference voltages at 67% would be 0.737V (0.67 times 1.10V). If VTT increased to 1.26V, the new GTL reference voltage would be 0.844V, calculated the same as before. If we wanted to adjust this down to 63%, we would simply multiply the current VTT voltage by the difference between the actual and desired percentages of full scale VTT (67% minus 63% equals 4% or 0.04) and then convert this to mV by multiplying by 1000. At 1.26V, the result would be 50mV and since we want to reduce the GTL reference voltage we would pick the value closest to -50mV. Sometimes tweaking VTT slightly up or down can help if none of the available values is close enough the desired offset. Of course, you will need to repeat the calculation using the new VTT.
Proper GTL reference level tuning can sometimes allow for a dramatic reduction in VTT and in some severe cases even permits the use of a lower core supply voltage (Vcore). The most recent x64 build of Prime95, version 25.6 build 6, provides an excellent means for testing the effectiveness of CPU-specific GTL tuning. Simply load the program, select the Blend type Torture Test, and watch for any instance to drop out. Note the instance number (which will correlate to the core in question), reset and enter the BIOS, make a small adjustment to the corresponding GTL reference value(s), and then start a new test run. If the test runs for a longer period of time then you can be confident that you are at least moving in the right direction. Continue this process until the system is sufficiently stable with the current settings.
Those that want to know more about GTL reference voltages and related tuning issues are encouraged to carefully examine more in-depth articles on the subject posted here and here.
so based on the info below, I should be setting my GTL VREF's to 67% of my VTT.
my VTT is 1.4v
so 67% of 1.4v is 0.983
I converted 0.983 to mv by x 1000. After doing this I recieve the #
93.8mv
does that look like I did my math right?
so there are 4 GTL VREF's I know 2 are for core 0/1 and 2 for 0/1
Based on the notes it sounds liek I am supose to set all 4 to 95mw.
Does that sound right?
http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3283&p=18
This can get tricky though as each die receives two GTL reference voltages - one for the FSB Data Bus (running at the full FSB transfer rate) and one for the FSB Address Bus (running at half the FSB transfer rate). This means CPU GTL_REF0 Ratio is for the Core 0/1 Data Bus, CPU GTL_REF1 Ratio is for the Core 2/3 Data Bus, CPU GTL_REF2 Ratio is for the Core 0/1 Address Bus, and CPU GTL_REF3 Ratio is for the Core2/3 Address Bus. CPU GTL_REF2 Ratio and CPU GTL_REF3 Ratio will have no affect with a dual-core CPU installed, in which case CPU GTL_REF0 Ratio is for the Core 0/1 Data Bus and CPU GTL_REF1 Ratio is for the Core 0/1 Address Bus. As a rule, adjustments are normally made to FSB Data Bus values first. These lines are consistently heavily loaded and as such are more susceptible to the detrimental effects of reduced signaling margins.
Intel's GTL specification dictates that each reference voltage should be tightly controlled as 67% of the current VTT voltage (0.67 times CPU VTT Voltage). Typically, changes in VTT are automatically compensated with standard voltage divider circuits dedicated to the generation of each GTL reference voltage. Historical data has shown that dual-core CPUs (in particular 45nm dual-cores) often clock to higher FSB levels when the GTL reference values are closer to 63 ~ 64% of VTT while quad-core CPUs usually need the full strength value or even a little more voltage (67 ~ 70% of VTT).
As an exercise in the application of basic math, consider the following. With VTT at 1.10V, the GTL reference voltages at 67% would be 0.737V (0.67 times 1.10V). If VTT increased to 1.26V, the new GTL reference voltage would be 0.844V, calculated the same as before. If we wanted to adjust this down to 63%, we would simply multiply the current VTT voltage by the difference between the actual and desired percentages of full scale VTT (67% minus 63% equals 4% or 0.04) and then convert this to mV by multiplying by 1000. At 1.26V, the result would be 50mV and since we want to reduce the GTL reference voltage we would pick the value closest to -50mV. Sometimes tweaking VTT slightly up or down can help if none of the available values is close enough the desired offset. Of course, you will need to repeat the calculation using the new VTT.
Proper GTL reference level tuning can sometimes allow for a dramatic reduction in VTT and in some severe cases even permits the use of a lower core supply voltage (Vcore). The most recent x64 build of Prime95, version 25.6 build 6, provides an excellent means for testing the effectiveness of CPU-specific GTL tuning. Simply load the program, select the Blend type Torture Test, and watch for any instance to drop out. Note the instance number (which will correlate to the core in question), reset and enter the BIOS, make a small adjustment to the corresponding GTL reference value(s), and then start a new test run. If the test runs for a longer period of time then you can be confident that you are at least moving in the right direction. Continue this process until the system is sufficiently stable with the current settings.
Those that want to know more about GTL reference voltages and related tuning issues are encouraged to carefully examine more in-depth articles on the subject posted here and here.
