- Joined
- Jan 14, 2007
- Messages
- 17,126
I think every time I see this thread my mind reads GAS prices... is the worst behind us? As I spent over $6/gallon the other day. And yes I know other countries its more..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Eh, just for comparison.“The retail price of the anniversary version of the GeForce RTX 5090 has reached $12,000.”
View attachment 831151
https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/1x56bpf/12k_now_at_microcenter/
Eh, just for comparison.
View attachment 831378
NIVIDA has a even bigger total marketshare on the AI market:
https://carboncredits.com/nvidia-co...n-2025-and-reveals-next-gen-ai-supercomputer/
AMD is a 4%:
View attachment 830434
Wishful thinking doesn't change reality.
We have only NVDIA GPU's in our datacenters and 0 AMD GPU's and that is not chagning as long I am have the power to decide.
Partly because the software is supporting CUDA, not AMD and partly because AMD is a bad performance/$ and partly because AMD lack features in the same way they do on the desktop.
Again the data doesn't agree with the far to vocal minority on forums.
But still not the RTX 4090?in another year's time we should have the 9070xt successor that should also be able to beat the 5080
Done:Buddy, this report is from 2024, not exactly reflecting current numbers as more have opted for AMD Helios racks versus 2024 when they didn't have the best options available yet. Get some newer data and not from a company trying to sell data analytic services...
very unlikely that AMD will make a gaming card that costs above $1000But still not the RTX 4090?
If you count APU and IGP, I am talking GPU's, stop being stupid, because in the next moment you talk GPU's and not shitty integrated graphics.
GPU's are like this:
View attachment 831324
Nobody cares for Intel Xe3 (4-core Xe³ graphics package with 512 shaders) or AMD Radeon 860M (8 CU's)
But nice of you once again to display your dishonesty.
And if you ignore FPS and image quality you might have had a point, but in reality, no:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlRpJ553RzE
There is a reason their GPU sales have plummet to 8% flat for many quarters now:
NVIDIA performance > AMD performance
DLSS > FSR
Ray Reconstruction > Ray Regeneration
NVIDIA FG > AMD FG
DLSS 5 > [AMD has Nothing]
RTX Remix > [AMD has Nothing]
CUDA > ROCm
NVIDIA Broadcast AI> [AMD has Nothing]
OptiX > OpenCL/HIP
NVENC > AMD Encoder
NVIDIA Reflex > AMD anti-lag
NVIDIA Studio Ecosystem > [AMD has Nothing]
You keep telling yourself that reality is not like it is, it only makes you part of a cult.
So the RTX 4090 will reach GTX 1080 Ti status, unbeaten for 3 generations....nice.very unlikely that AMD will make a gaming card that costs above $1000
Again, yo can mix and match IGP/APU's and GPU's in your "argumentation" like you do.For no one caring, Intel GPU wise has dominance, just not what you care about. The world obviously differs. Now no one cares about your 4090 if they are shopping for a card less than $800. Even Jensen says a 5070 is faster than a 4090. So why compare a 4090 against AMD current generation? Anything game wise graphics card, SUB $850, AMD has clear leadership and for most the better gaming card to get, in performance, in price, availability and I say in general, a more decent community is AMD.