Bull fucking shit. I've just read it. And it communicates the exact same concerns that I have, and most honest people have that looked at diversity politics objectively. Nowhere did it say that they shouldn't hire women or that women are unsuitable to work at a tech company. If you think that's what he's saying then you're misrepresenting it as well, either on purpose or due to lack of understanding of the nuances.
Somebody didn't read the footnotes, lemme give you the highlights (posted in the other thread)
From the man himself:
"I’m simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women differ in part due to biological causes"
He's actually "simply stating" women are inferior at coding because biology. He doesn't have the balls to come out and say that (or stupidly thought blunting the argument would be more convincing) and couches it with "distribution" and "part" but that's dressing on a turd sandwich.
Then there's this:
"For heterosexual romantic relationships, men are more strongly judged by status and women by beauty. Again, this has biological origins"
And this:
"women spend more money than men"
First quote says it all. Cut away the bullshit and it reduces to "I’m simply stating that the...abilities of men and women differ...due to biological causes"