Going to need tape backups soon, not sure where to start

Discussion in 'SSDs & Data Storage' started by IceDigger, Mar 9, 2019.

  1. IceDigger

    IceDigger [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,437
    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2001
    So my one company I work for is going to need tape backups in the next 6 months to a year.

    I have never used tapes before.

    Hot damn the drives are expensive but the tapes are cheap.

    Any recomendations? Probably about 1TB of info. Tons of tiny files.
     
  2. drescherjm

    drescherjm [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    14,174
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    For 1TB I would not use tape. It's not economical to do so. I mean you buy a $2000 to $3000 tape drive with 15TB tapes and then buy 3 tapes to have 3 full backups. Tape drives make more sense when you have 20+ tapes.
     
    danswartz likes this.
  3. IceDigger

    IceDigger [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,437
    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2001
    I am going to be needing a full backup a day.
     
  4. cyclone3d

    cyclone3d [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    12,787
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Why? Why not differential backups NOT on tape and then do full backups at a more spaced out interval?

    There are so many much better solutions out there now.
     
    drescherjm and pendragon1 like this.
  5. IndyJoe1977

    IndyJoe1977 n00b

    Messages:
    14
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2019
    I would almost cloud backup just 1TB. That's nothing. These guys are right...tape for 1TB isn't economical at all.
     
    LightsOut41 likes this.
  6. Spartacus09

    Spartacus09 Gawd

    Messages:
    692
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2018
    S3 glacier backup is the route I’d go
     
  7. likeman

    likeman Gawd

    Messages:
    604
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2011
    You can generally get tape drives for less than 100

    Also this text box screwing around with the text as I can't use Google Voice to correct words it has incorrectly used
     
  8. ND40oz

    ND40oz [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    11,153
    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2005
    How often do you need to send the tapes offsite and what's the retention period? That will dictate your setup. What's the reasoning behind it, just to have offline backups?
     
  9. dedobot

    dedobot [H]Lite

    Messages:
    83
    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2012
    For 1TB LTO tape is overkill. Plenty of other much more flexible and inexpensive solutions.
    Also keep in mind although the tapes are highly reliable, same can't be said for the tape devices/tape robotic libraries .
     
  10. danswartz

    danswartz 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,607
    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    I'd rather see an ESATA enclosure, with hot-plug 2-4TB drives...
     
  11. Nausicaa

    Nausicaa [H]Lite

    Messages:
    120
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Tape use is pretty rare. Seems like its overkill
     
  12. showard

    showard n00b

    Messages:
    6
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2019
    As if it needs to be said yet again: skip the tapes.
    Tapes are so 20th century. Tapes are VERY unreliable.

    Instead ...
    You can backup to the cloud.
    You can backup to an HDD.

    I use the latter. I do a full Macrium backup every weekend, and incrementals several times a week. The 8 TB USB drive from WD ("Elements") cost around $150.

    But ... you didn't say anything about retention. Lacking that there's no way to make a full recommendation.
     
  13. mwroobel

    mwroobel [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,882
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    You have ABSOLUTELY no idea what you are talking about. Tape is the most reliable easily-removable backup medium out there. It has bit error rates that hard drives can't touch (Average consumer HDD have 1 URE in 10^14, Enterprise in 10^15 and LTO 7+ 1 in 10^19. That is 5 orders of magnitude higher than the standard consumer drives many are using for their backups. In many fields, tape backups (using WORM tapes) are the only legally accepted backup format because it cannot be changed (in any known way) after writing. It is used in many small, medium and large organizations. Year over year shipments of tape have been increasing, in fact in 2016 (the last year I have data on) they shipped 48,000 Petabytes (Raw) of tape storage, and tape has been flat or increasing year over year while spinner shipments have been declining year over year.
     
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2019
    drescherjm likes this.
  14. Jandor

    Jandor n00b

    Messages:
    52
    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2018
    Take care because even the best bit error system doesn't reconstruct a tape with decaying magnetic band, and this is always happening much sooner than for hard drives. I have standard IDE hard drives that are 30 year old and that I can read !!! This would be unbelievable for my older 25 years old QIC cartridges, which have all become unreadable, but that is also happening to my not so old Zip disks. The thing is that hard drives have their magnetic disk protected in an enclosed environment. The only thing to take care is for the electronics outside the hard drive and the temperature where you stack your hard drives. So I frankly recommend hard drives for storage and I am no so sure that the tapes are so much cheaper per byte. Now there are different kind of tapes for different purposes as you mentioned. I know systems in airports and army that are based on hardware from the 70s that has been updated with new hardware virtualization the old one including revised interfaces for new hard drives to replace older 12'' drives, just because everything works as expected and all the people working there already know how to used it with all the needed security protocols... and the optical drives (CDR, DVDR and BDR) are also good as long as they are of quality (check for Japanese brands made in Japan only) and stored in a very stable environment.
     
  15. ochadd

    ochadd Gawd

    Messages:
    850
    Joined:
    May 9, 2008
    1 TB a day I'd go hard drive 100% if I had the option. Replicate to another site if you have one or a hosted/cloud service. Can't imagine toggling tapes again and physically carrying them around all the time. I still have the grind of a stuck tape not ejecting ingrained in my brain. 5-6 years every single morning. neeyahh neeyah click click click click neeyahhh.... nothing. Fuck you tape.
     
  16. drescherjm

    drescherjm [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    14,174
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    I actually don't mind tape at work but I have 100TB currently. Most days I insert a tape and let the drive do its job for hours creating an incremental or differential backup based on the alternating sets of fulls I have.

    Although with that said for 13 years I had a 2 drive 24 slot autochanger that did most of the work for me. I replaced it with a single drive LTO7 because with the size of tapes the tape changes were not going to be a big deal.
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2019 at 10:40 PM
  17. cyclone3d

    cyclone3d [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    12,787
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Only problem with that analogy is that you have to keep using more and more tapes... HDDs and cloud storage is not going to need near as many over time. Reason being for cloud storage is that there are going to be people/companies that stop using a service. There is also data de-duplication and compression that reduces the storage space needed by quite a lot.

    And then you generally also are not going to need to keep backups older than a certain amount of time.. so the space can be reclaimed.

    Tapes generally don't get re-used, right?
     
  18. drescherjm

    drescherjm [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    14,174
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    I reuse tapes for user public / private backups and system backups after a 1 year retention period expires. With that said we do have backups of medical images in which we always append and never remove so these don't recycle ever.