Allright, i have a somewhat weird observation:
Coming from an AMD machine with 2 cores, the C2D machine (now running for 2 or 3 months) actually "feels" slower. Don't get me wrong, all the benchmarks are in favor of the C2D and my games even get higher frames.
BUT! My windows XP seems to "react" slower, i don't want to say sluggish, but it just doesn't feel as zippy as my older AMD system. Or even for that matter, it seems not as zippy as one of our old Hyperthreading P4 PCs in Windows XP.
This is not due to spyware or anything, it happens after a fresh install as well. Another observation is that my Windows Install actually took a little LONGER than with the X2 chip....
Does anyone have a similar experience?
My setup:
C2D 6400 (no matter if stock or o/c to 3.2)
Giga DS3
2GB TeamSkill DDR2
1900XT
old AMD machine:
3800X2
DFI Ultra-d
2GB PQI DDR1
1900XT
Coming from an AMD machine with 2 cores, the C2D machine (now running for 2 or 3 months) actually "feels" slower. Don't get me wrong, all the benchmarks are in favor of the C2D and my games even get higher frames.
BUT! My windows XP seems to "react" slower, i don't want to say sluggish, but it just doesn't feel as zippy as my older AMD system. Or even for that matter, it seems not as zippy as one of our old Hyperthreading P4 PCs in Windows XP.
This is not due to spyware or anything, it happens after a fresh install as well. Another observation is that my Windows Install actually took a little LONGER than with the X2 chip....
Does anyone have a similar experience?
My setup:
C2D 6400 (no matter if stock or o/c to 3.2)
Giga DS3
2GB TeamSkill DDR2
1900XT
old AMD machine:
3800X2
DFI Ultra-d
2GB PQI DDR1
1900XT