GCHQ Unlawfully Spied On British Citizens For Years

Discussion in '[H]ard|OCP Front Page News' started by HardOCP News, Feb 6, 2015.

  1. HardOCP News

    HardOCP News [H] News

    Messages:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 1969
    What do rulings like this even mean? Is it going to change anything? Are they going to stop the “bulk interception” of electronic communications?

     
  2. oROEchimaru

    oROEchimaru [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,596
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
  3. lcpiper

    lcpiper [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,815
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    Umm, what does this ruling mean?

    It means that although there was nothing illegal about what the Brits and US were doing except that the protections that were set up for people were secret protections that the people weren't aware of. Now that people know about the protections that are there for them, the GCHQ's rules are no longer illegal.

    Yea your mostly right Steve, this don't mean shit and doesn't address anyone stopping anything anyway.
     
  4. Retronym

    Retronym Something big is coming.

    Messages:
    23,857
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    The government has done nothing wrong.

    The government has done nothing wrong.

    The government has done nothing wrong.

    The government has done nothing wrong.
     
  5. lcpiper

    lcpiper [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,815
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    It looks like what it boils down to is GCHQ didn't want people to know what they and the NSA were doing, obvious one right, and so they couldn't tell people that GCHQ had created rules to protect them from being abused under the programs without making everyone aware of the programs themselves so the GCHQ's rules kept the protections secret in order to keep the programs secret.

    Under Articles 8 or 10” of the European convention on human rights, (not sure why they can't pin it down to 8 or 10, I mean which is it?), if people don't know about their protections then they aren't protected cause they can't complain about a violation of their protections under the law if they don't know the protection exists. The European Convention is an EU construct and the UK is a member of the EU and legally have signed onto this treaty and bound under it for what that's worth.
     
  6. lcpiper

    lcpiper [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,815
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    Aardvark I am only interpreting the article not making my own Judgement on it.

    Reading works best when you make the effort and try to comprehend what you have read :rolleyes:
     
  7. Retronym

    Retronym Something big is coming.

    Messages:
    23,857
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    That wasn't a response to you.

    Just stating the facts.
     
  8. lcpiper

    lcpiper [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,815
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    Ahh, and I got all defensive for no reason.

    Remove foot from mouth:eek:
     
  9. MrLonghair

    MrLonghair [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,764
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    How dare they protect the country and its citizens from terrorist attacks and organized crime :rolleyes:
     
  10. Retronym

    Retronym Something big is coming.

    Messages:
    23,857
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007