• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Gaming Benchmarks Reveal AMD AGESA 1.2.0.2b Patch Brings Slightly Better Gaming Performance On Ryzen CPUs

erek

[H]F Junkie
2FA
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
12,839
Local reference:
ASUS Intros “Core Tuning Config For Gaming” Feature In AM5 BIOS, Reduces Overall System Latency For Faster Performance On Ryzen CPUs
Replies 5
Saturday at 8:40 PM

“As mentioned in the results, this was achieved via BIOS 3065 Beta, which isn't yet official. Currently, you can only download the BIOS 3057 for this particular model, which comes with the AGESA 1.2.0.2a patch. However, the latest one should come out in a few days. One more thing to point out here is that the 1.2.0.2b patch shows improved memory latency as tested by the user in AIDA64 Extreme. As mentioned in the intro, the memory latency decreased to 64 ns from over 68 ns. This is similar to pre-AGESA 1.2.0.2a patch latency.

News Source: Compusemble

Source: https://wccftech.com/amd-agesa-1-2-0-2b-patch-better-gaming-performance-on-ryzen-cpus/
 
Any idea what specifically was changed here?

Sounds odd to have a BIOS change effect... this whatever it is.
 
Sounds good.

If I try to set my memory above 5200, as things are, the system locks and I have to open the case and pull out the GPU to do a cmos reset.

Can you buy a cable with a button for that?

Maybe this will help?
 
Sounds good.

If I try to set my memory above 5200, as things are, the system locks and I have to open the case and pull out the GPU to do a cmos reset.

Can you buy a cable with a button for that?

Maybe this will help?

Depends... Does your board have pin headers to short? You can harvest an old power/reset case switch and plug it into those headers. If you've got one of the boards where they put a button on the board rather than headers, it's harder.
 
Depends... Does your board have pin headers to short? You can harvest an old power/reset case switch and plug it into those headers. If you've got one of the boards where they put a button on the board rather than headers, it's harder.

Pin headers. Part of what makes it such a pita to get at them.
 
Sounds good.

If I try to set my memory above 5200, as things are, the system locks and I have to open the case and pull out the GPU to do a cmos reset.

Can you buy a cable with a button for that?

Maybe this will help?

I think you're expecting a lot out of that (or any current platform) with 192GB of RAM.
 
I think you're expecting a lot out of that (or any current platform) with 192GB of RAM.
Perhaps, though even with just 1 dimm, I tried all 4, its the same. So I think there is more going on. My guess is I got shorted on the silicone lottery and the memory controller is able to do at spec only. The cpu does only guarantee 5200 after all.
 
Perhaps, though even with just 1 dimm, I tried all 4, its the same. So I think there is more going on. My guess is I got shorted on the silicone lottery and the memory controller is able to do at spec only. The cpu does only guarantee 5200 after all.

Uh huh, and did that single module happen to be a dual-rank 48GB Micron DIMM?
 
It did. I already know what your trying to say.

It may be worth looking at the 9000 series, I've used a handful of them by now and they seem to have much stronger IMC capabilities than the 7000 series. My 9900X was able to run 6400 CL30 with 2200 fabric and only 1.100 vsoc.
 
It may be worth looking at the 9000 series, I've used a handful of them by now and they seem to have much stronger IMC capabilities than the 7000 series. My 9900X was able to run 6400 CL30 with 2200 fabric and only 1.100 vsoc.

The Zen 5 memory controller is on the client I/O die (cIOD), which was brought over from Zen 4 unchanged. That's why it's still 6nm, still has a RDNA 2-based iGPU, and why USB4 had to be added via a separate 3rd party controller.
 
The Zen 5 memory controller is on the client I/O die (cIOD), which was brought over from Zen 4 unchanged. That's why it's still 6nm, still has a RDNA 2-based iGPU, and why USB4 had to be added via a separate 3rd party controller.

Same design does not mean no improvements. Alder lake and Raptor lake have the same design, and their capabilities are quite different.
 
Same design does not mean no improvements. Alder lake and Raptor lake have the same design, and their capabilities are quite different.

It's not "the same design", The client I/O die is literally the same chiplet. There are no differences, changes, or improvements beyond AGESA updates (which would apply to Zen 4 also). If you have any evidence to suggest that there have been improvements, anywhere, please post that evidence here, as that would seem to contradict all currently known facts.

https://www.techpowerup.com/327388/amd-granite-ridge-zen-5-processor-annotated
Lastly, there's the client I/O die (cIOD). There's nothing new to report here, the chip is carried over from "Raphael." It is built on the TSMC N6 (6 nm) node. Nearly 1/3rd of the die-area is taken up by the iGPU and its allied components, such as the media acceleration engine, and display engine. The iGPU is based on the RDNA 2 graphics architecture, and has just one workgroup processor (WGP), for two compute units (CU), or 128 stream processors. Other key components on the cIOD are the 28-lane PCIe Gen 5 interface, the two IFoP ports for the CCDs, a fairly large SoC I/O consisting of USB 3.x and legacy connectivity, and the all important DDR5 memory controller with its dual-channel (four sub-channel) memory interface.

https://www.anandtech.com/show/2146...bile-strix-point-with-rdna-35-igpu-xdna-2-npu
At Computex 2024, we confirmed that the Ryzen 9000 series actually uses the same I/O die as the Ryzen 7000 series, which was built using TSMC's 6 nm process. The only real difference between the Ryzen 9000 and Ryzen 7000 chips is that the Ryzen 9000 incorporates the latest Zen 5 cores in place of Zen 4 cores.

https://www.guru3d.com/story/amd-ryzen-9000-die-shots-gets-annotated-in-detail/
he client I/O die in the Granite Ridge package remains unchanged from Raphael and is built using TSMC's N6 6-nanometer process. About one-third of the cIOD's die area is dedicated to the integrated GPU (iGPU) and related components, including the media acceleration engine and display engine. The iGPU is based on the RDNA 2 architecture and features a single Workgroup Processor (WGP) with two Compute Units (CU), totaling 128 stream processors.

Key features of the cIOD include a 28-lane PCIe Gen 5 interface, two IFoP ports for connecting the CCDs, extensive System on Chip (SoC) I/O capabilities such as USB 3.x and legacy connectivity, and a DDR5 memory controller. The memory controller supports a dual-channel configuration with four sub-channels, enhancing memory bandwidth and efficiency.
 
From your link:


Firmware, aka AGESA updates.
Yeah well it also properly works with 4 DIMMs, so whatever firmware things they did it’s way the hell smoother than before.

Maybe how they are interfacing with that IO die is different not sure but it works much nicer with far fewer issues than previous generations.
 
Back
Top