Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
pelo is right in every way. although, the only reason I purchased my zambezi is because in all honesty it's an overclocking beast. I have mine @ only 4.2 right now idling at about 7c and 18c under load.
did you take koolance anti-freeze into account while making your physics calculations?This is impossible in a 70f room (as in, bends the laws of physics) unless you're using a chiller, a phase change setup, a TEC or magic to cool your cpu.
did you take koolance anti-freeze into account while making your physics calculations?
sorry for getting off topic pelo, thank you for the great links
here is stock settings before OC 2 days ago. Have a lot of work to do at the moment so no time to put under load with new settings and take screen. nothing to prove and hate getting off topic
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/696/tempfh.png/
Koolance just calles it anti-freeze. technically its colored water. I believe it would be the radiator that makes it so cold, has nothing to do with the water. do you guys have nothing better to do than just try to find something wrong with others beliefs? ok so I could be wrong, just going by what my software tells me... I'm an A+ cert and none of this is covered in what I know and learned. did you not start somewhere?
Thats the way this place is dude. I actually like it though. You come in here stating things, youd better make sure its right cause its going to get run thru the ringer.
The upside to this is that if you read something on here, youll know pretty quick if its legit or not. Itll get shredded to the bone if its bogus. Thats why I use this forum for most of my learning. The statements made here get peer reviewed with extreme prejudice!![]()
Unless you use some sort of chemical coolant that 7C is not possible with a water block/radiator cooling in ambient room temperature (unless the room is 7C or less). If you don't like someone questioning the results too bad...wouldn't u want to hear the truth instead of believing garbage readings? It's well known AMD has wonky cpu temp readings so learn to deal with it.
So then, is the FX 4100 a good upgrade, worthy of the $95 - $110 spent, if I'm currently using an Athlon II x3 440 OCed to 3.5GHz ?
It's not much of an upgrade. You'd be better served by a Phenom II or the 960T as both chips perform better than the 4100. Don't just look at clock speed, it's not indicative of performance.