Alright...I've searched for hours and received about 100 different combinations of answers, mostly on reddit. Time to go to the experts.
I have a 1440p 144hz freesync monitor, Vega 56 flashed to 64. PUBG is my primary game right now, usually getting around 70-140 FPS in this shit-coded game with most things on low/very low except textures and AA.
I'm currently using Freesync and Enhanced Sync in combo, but I'm not sure this is best. Things look fine for me, no visible tearing, no complaints...but I just want to make sure that my research is correct and that this is what I should be using.
I thought that was the correct "combo" of options, but after reading more, I'm not sure enhanced sync is doing anything besides introducing some latency, as I've never gotten about 120-140 FPS in PUBG.
So, part of me wants to try CHILL to limit my FPS to 70-140, but not have any latency introduced.
Why is this so poorly documented. AMD needs to release an "IF, THEN" chart for us noobs to be able to piece this together.
I have a 1440p 144hz freesync monitor, Vega 56 flashed to 64. PUBG is my primary game right now, usually getting around 70-140 FPS in this shit-coded game with most things on low/very low except textures and AA.
I'm currently using Freesync and Enhanced Sync in combo, but I'm not sure this is best. Things look fine for me, no visible tearing, no complaints...but I just want to make sure that my research is correct and that this is what I should be using.
I thought that was the correct "combo" of options, but after reading more, I'm not sure enhanced sync is doing anything besides introducing some latency, as I've never gotten about 120-140 FPS in PUBG.
So, part of me wants to try CHILL to limit my FPS to 70-140, but not have any latency introduced.
Why is this so poorly documented. AMD needs to release an "IF, THEN" chart for us noobs to be able to piece this together.