• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Forceware Driver Roundup, 56.72 - 62.01

oozish said:
I don't agree with that roundup. I'm using the 61.35's and will be hardpressed to be convinced those don't represent the best Nvidia has released so far; at least as far as Far Cry performance and (diminished) anomolies are concerned.s
Click to expand...

I've tested about all the drivers except the 62.01's and the 61.71's and 61.72 WHQL's have been the best i've used. I havn't experienced these IQ issues in Far Cry that your talking about. The 61.7x's seem to be the favorites for the majority.
 
ya, i was using both those before I switched. I was pretty happy with 61.72
 
I hate graphs that don't start at 0. Look at this graph...

forcew6.GIF



The difference between the best and the worst is FAR less than 1fps.
 
TheSpoon said:
I hate graphs that don't start at 0. Look at this graph...

The difference between the best and the worst is FAR less than 1fps.
Click to expand...

They do that because of the performance difference being so small. If you started at zero, it would be impossible to tell the performance difference between the 6 different driver sets according to the bar graphs.
 
burningrave101 said:
They do that because of the performance difference being so small. If you started at zero, it would be impossible to tell the performance difference between the 6 different driver sets according to the bar graphs.
Click to expand...

i can understand why they changed the x-axis scale since the differences were so small, but i think they might of overdone it. at first look at the graph i thought the 62.01's were almost doubling the score of the 61.72's, before looking at numbers of course :p
 
maxxo said:
i can understand why they changed the x-axis scale since the differences were so small, but i think they might of overdone it. at first look at the graph i thought the 62.01's were almost doubling the score of the 61.72's, before looking at numbers of course :p
Click to expand...


LOL, that is funny. We spend so much time on this, haha.
 
burningrave101 said:
They do that because of the performance difference being so small. If you started at zero, it would be impossible to tell the performance difference between the 6 different driver sets according to the bar graphs.
Click to expand...

Right, so they should plot it on a graph that starts with 0, thereby confirming that the performance difference is almost nonexistant.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top