![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Faster response time Lcd = Faster overall performance feeling!?
- Thread starter sram
- Start date
those faster response times on the packages don't usually refer to what people usually feel
response time is the time it takes from g to g or b to w, usual monitors are 6-8ms while some high end ones tout 2ms. This will usually affect the "ghost" effect some people notice with fast motion, looks like mouse trails almost in some cases, in others reminds of motion blur.
The feel is something not printed on the package. It's the input delay. Basically the time it takes for the image to be drawn on screen from the time it was sent from the video card. The average is about 1 fps or roughly 33ms. Some screens can do better, I've clocked my LG screen pulling from 20-30ms, a friend's BenQ does 25-35ms. You can test it via taking a picture with a crt or (notebook lcd) and seeing how it displays a timer on screen.
The worse the input lag, the worse the feel.
response time is the time it takes from g to g or b to w, usual monitors are 6-8ms while some high end ones tout 2ms. This will usually affect the "ghost" effect some people notice with fast motion, looks like mouse trails almost in some cases, in others reminds of motion blur.
The feel is something not printed on the package. It's the input delay. Basically the time it takes for the image to be drawn on screen from the time it was sent from the video card. The average is about 1 fps or roughly 33ms. Some screens can do better, I've clocked my LG screen pulling from 20-30ms, a friend's BenQ does 25-35ms. You can test it via taking a picture with a crt or (notebook lcd) and seeing how it displays a timer on screen.
The worse the input lag, the worse the feel.
Yes, I have to agree. A proper monitor can determine the "perceived" performance. If you had a low quality wireless mouse along with a high response time monitor, the performance of the wireless mouse will appear to be even worse. If you put it together with a CRT monitor (which has the lowest response time of all monitors), the performance would improve. I've done it!