• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Fast 3dMark11 Test

Araxie

Araxie

Supreme [H]ardness
2FA
Joined
Feb 11, 2013
Messages
6,478
So one of my 660TI's Died, or at least have a serious vRAM memory problem with Tons of artifacts everywhere.. I've decided to make some single test with my other 660TI and started for 3dmark11 Free edition and I was freaking impressed how this Drivers improved The total score in the Run.. my last single tested drivers was with 314.22. and show a score of:
P8949
Graphic: 9133.

Now with this beta(331.40) drivers

the score bumped to:

P10857
Graphic:11978
(3dmark Link)

the card its stock ATM I will be doing some test overclocked and update results soon.. but I really like the look of the card at stock.. :)
 
your test #3 got 8,240.9 fps which is pretty awesome. not sure if that was a glitch though.
 
I made couple of test that present the same behavior.. A little more here, a little less there but more or less the same result, tonight y will try with some overclocks.. I have to say that my card its already reaching itselft a high clock.. (1312mhz) my burned card could reach 1333mhz at stock and 1400mhz of overclock, with KGB unlock at 150%power target could handle another +65 to be fully stable at 1465mhz.. This card I have never tested overclocking.. But at 1312mhz i do not think the margin without unlock the bios could be so high... I hope this can overclock at more or less same level as my damaged golden 660Ti X_X tonight i make the test.
 
SolidBladez said:
It's because you're using version 1.0.5.0. Try updating to 1.1

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

hi, thanks, I updated to 1.1 and I got This Results@3dmark Link

ICE STORM: 143594
Graphics: 316245
physics: 49332

CLOUD GATE: 21023
Graphics: 43352
Physics: 7306

FIRE STRIKE : 6055
Graphics: 6740
Physics: 10047
Combined: 2568

I have never tested with those test and those results, and I really don't know how good or bad are.... so please if anyone can tell me how are those results i will be very grateful...
 
*Update*

As I thought.. Overclocking the Card my Score bumped just a minimal amount of points..

I could oc +50 Clock and +500Memory.

These are my new results@3dmark Link:

Detailed:

Ice Storm: 143960
Graphics 315129
physics: 49623

Cloud Gate: 21272
Graphics: 45664
Physics: 7413

Fire Strike: 6107
Graphics: 6802
Physics: 10079
Combined: 2592

*EDITED a mistake in results..
 
Last edited:
You type a 6 instead of a 3 in your first fire strike results ? Otherwise how did your score drop 3000 points lol. Unless it glitched the first time and gave you way to high of score. But, your overall is higher so my guess u typed wrong.
 
HOODedDutchman said:
You type a 6 instead of a 3 in your first fire strike results ? Otherwise how did your score drop 3000 points lol. Unless it glitched the first time and gave you way to high of score. But, your overall is higher so my guess u typed wrong.
Click to expand...

Yeah, thanks i typed wrong but in the second test in fact the result its 6802 just barely better than first 6740.. (Also edited the previous post).

How good are this results for this card?..
 
Araxie said:
*Update*

As I thought.. Overclocking the Card my Score bumped just a minimal amount of points..

I could oc +50 Clock and +500Memory.

These are my new results@3dmark Link:

Detailed:

Ice Storm: 143960
Graphics 315129
physics: 49623

Cloud Gate: 21272
Graphics: 45664
Physics: 7413

Fire Strike: 6107
Graphics: 6802
Physics: 10079
Combined: 2592

*EDITED a mistake in results..
Click to expand...

IF you want a comparison to a heavily o/c'd 7950 (system in sig below), here are my results:

Ice Storm: 189118
Graphics 390933.0
physics: 67378.0

Cloud Gate: 27855
Graphics: 62342.0
Physics: 9487

Fire Strike: 8724 (Number #2 World Record for 7950!)
Graphics: 9799
Physics: 12938
Combined: 3775
 
ccityinstaller said:
IF you want a comparison to a heavily o/c'd 7950 (system in sig below), here are my results:

Ice Storm: 189118
Graphics 390933.0
physics: 67378.0

Cloud Gate: 27855
Graphics: 62342.0
Physics: 9487

Fire Strike: 8724 (Number #2 World Record for 7950!)
Graphics: 9799
Physics: 12938
Combined: 3775
Click to expand...

well thats a grotesque result compared to mine... so can I assume my results are just average?.
 
Yeah they look normal to me. It's probably because your GPU has a high boost clock. Try having GPU-Z open while you run the benchmark and note the maximum core speed. Also check the ASIC % by right clicking the toolbar and selecting ASIC %.

And ignore my earlier post. I thought you were using 3DMark (2013) originally, not the 2011 version. :eek:
 
I ran first 3dmark 11 then upgraded to 13(1.1) (links present).. hehehe. I use Evga's Precision X hardware monitor tool that show a max boost clock of 1350mhz.. my ASIC % its 85% wich I think its pretty decent..
 
Araxie said:
well thats a grotesque result compared to mine... so can I assume my results are just average?.
Click to expand...

Well, I wouldn't say that your results are terrible, but I don't know much about how Nvidia cards tend to bench with 3DMark11..Please keep in mind that when I say my GPU is heavily, O/C'd I am talking to the moon (base 800mhz, OC is 1.3Ghz)..
 
googling a bit.. I found that average 660TI Score in FireStrike Graphic result 5500, factory Oc'd Asus, MSI,EVGA Score arround 5750... GTX 670 Factory OC'd Score average of 6300. all of this results are still kinda old (the newer found on june) so I guess according to those results and with newer drivers my 6800+/- Graphics Score in FireStrike are quite good one of the highest results on FireStrike according to 3dmark high OC'd 660TIs are in the 6000 Points line, so not bad at all..
 
I've just been testing undervolting on my 7870 tahiti card and doing some benchmarks. So I'll share mine since you seem to be looking for comparisons.
This thing gets 7000 on firestrike when o/ced to 1200mhz on the core. It gets around 6100 at stock clocks. That's graphics scores not overall.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1448866
 
picket23 said:
I've just been testing undervolting on my 7870 tahiti card and doing some benchmarks. So I'll share mine since you seem to be looking for comparisons.
This thing gets 7000 on firestrike when o/ced to 1200mhz on the core. It gets around 6100 at stock clocks. That's graphics scores not overall.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1448866
Click to expand...

yup i want some good comparisons, this weekend I will apply KGB Unlock to bump up voltage to 1.212 so I can achieve more clock. in the damaged card I was able to achieve 1445mhz at 1.212 with 7200mhz memory so I hope to achieve those numbers on my actual card.. btw I love how well scale the overclock on that 7870XT.. <3.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top