• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Extremely slow shared folder data transfers on server itself.

techtips

Gawd
Joined
Jan 3, 2011
Messages
530
Good morning everyone,

I am on my old HP EX490 media server doing some much needed maintenance of the files on it and I've come across something quite disturbing to me.

I am moving data from one shared folder (videos) to my other shared folder (uTorrent) and the transfer rate is about 4.09 MB/s!!!

Concerned, I ran HD Tach on my EX490 and each 2TB WD/Seagate drive returns an average read between 93 MB/s to 100 MB/s.

I did notice that HD Tach identifies my hard drives as Sata 150 (Sata 1 = 150MB/s ). The EX490 is capable of Sata 2 disk speeds (300MB/s).

Easy internal expandability with tool-free expansion bays allowing
you to add additional SATA I or SATA II disk drives. Or expand
your storage capacity externally using the 4 USB ports and the fast
eSATA port.

Here is what I am referring to:

JLz3ez0.png


ElnxPwk.png


2BxFtX5.png



Any suggestions on why the EX490 under HD Tach program is reporting my drives as a Sata 1 connection/speed?
lastly, any ideas why the horrible transfer speeds? I am not transferring across the network. This data is being moved along on my WHS EX490 box.


Thank you
 
I assume nothing else is accessing the disks involved during the move. Perhaps you have high fragmentation?
 
We could use more details about the pool/share configuration. Pending that, I'll speculate wildly.

You should check SMART & event logs, just to be sure that it's not hardware.

Looks like you're moving from a local drive letter to an SMB share. Even with both on the same server, this can force Explorer to copy/delete ALL the data, rather than change just the directory entries. You should see faster results by moving from D:\Data\Videos\ to D:\Data\uTorrent\ or whatever applies.

Assuming you have folder duplication across the 2 storage drives (because it's Windows Home Server), you're reading & writing to both HDs simultaneously. Add some fragmentation, throw in WHS's generally weak performance, and 4MB/sec is plausible.
 
We could use more details about the pool/share configuration. Pending that, I'll speculate wildly.

You should check SMART & event logs, just to be sure that it's not hardware.

Looks like you're moving from a local drive letter to an SMB share. Even with both on the same server, this can force Explorer to copy/delete ALL the data, rather than change just the directory entries. You should see faster results by moving from D:\Data\Videos\ to D:\Data\uTorrent\ or whatever applies.

Assuming you have folder duplication across the 2 storage drives (because it's Windows Home Server), you're reading & writing to both HDs simultaneously. Add some fragmentation, throw in WHS's generally weak performance, and 4MB/sec is plausible.


Sorry, as I'm not a n00b with computers, I am a n00b regarding data and servers haha

So I'll do my best.

Currently my EX490 home server has:
-Intel Q9550s core2quad CPU
-4GB DDR2 memory
-8TB (2tbx4) WD Green drives.


I am moving files from SMB share to SMB share...such as \\ServerName\Videos to \\ServerName\Public, see below from a screenshot earlier.:

WtlAXSI.png



I have tried to cut/copy and it's about the same performance.


I do have folder duplication/drive extender across my 4 drives (2tb each). I thought that the folder duplication would somehow work after a data transfer has occurred and not during.
 
I am moving files from SMB share to SMB share...such as \\ServerName\Videos to \\ServerName\Public, see below from a screenshot earlier.:
Earlier pics show T:. Is it mapped from \\ServerName\?

Either way, I still suspect SMB might be getting in the way. If you're remoted into the server, you can - and should - work with the HDs directly. If not, try it at least once.

I do have folder duplication/drive extender across my 4 drives (2tb each). I thought that the folder duplication would somehow work after a data transfer has occurred and not during.
I believe you are correct here. Sorry - it's been a while since I WHSed.
 
Back
Top