Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You like small shiny things?wuya said:...but has a silver plate on top of it.
I have a bytecc 3.5" external enclosure. Aluminum case.
So what does this say?
scottatwittenberg said:you probably should go to the taskbar and click the little "disconnect device" icon thing.. then turn it off. but i turned off mine before and turned it on hours later and it was fine...
The_Mage18 said:That simply makes sure there are no waiting writes or reads before "disconnecting" the drivers. If the activity light is dark and has been for a few seconds, you can turn it off without worries. Win 2K ME and 98 were the only ones that griped about a device being unplugged before you clicked disconnect device.
DougLite said:Write caching _should_ be disabled on external drives, by default, in Windows XP. If you decide to turn on write caching, and turn the drive off while a write is still in the buffer, that can be very bad news. However, if you're using the NTFS on the disk, chkdsk should be able to use the journal to recover the version of the file that existed before the cached write was lost. Yet another reason why NTFS > FAT32.
DougLite said:The upper limit of typical safe operating temperatures is about 40C/102F, and every degree above that pretty dramatically increases the chance of failure, and most drives become totally non-operational (or fail) between 50 and 55C.
Also, the package label says it transfers data at the rate of 12 MB/S and 480 MB/S via USB2. But I am only getting 0.8 MB/S! How come!?
DougLite said:When reading transfer rates, Capital "B" != lower case "b." There are eight "b" (bits) in one "B" (byte). Using "b" gets you a more marketable, bigger number.
However, .8MB/sec is abyssmal. Make sure you have the latest chipset drivers installed on your system, remove hubs between your system and the drive, and try testing again. I wouldn't worry about synthetic transfer measurements if the drive seems fast with its normal workload.
BYTECC 3.5" Aluminum Mobile Enclosure
USB 2.0
Supports USB 2.0 transfer rates of 12Mbps and 480 Mbps
92%
30.4 GB of 33.0 GB complete 56/59 folders 201/848 files
800.0 KB/s (00:54:00 remaining)
wuya said:.Code:92% 30.4 GB of 33.0 GB complete 56/59 folders 201/848 files 800.0 KB/s (00:54:00 remaining)
Something similer happened to me, I had a 200 in a brand new firewire enclosure and about 20min after transfering some files to the drive one of the resistors on the system board for the enclosure blew and the enclosure went dead. then got the same "delayed write to MFT failed." Pulled the drive which was cool (enclosure had very good cooling) and put it in another enclosure and found that because of this the MFT was corrupt and Checkdisk refused to touch it since the drive was now in windows mind to be unformatedWS6 said:bought an Adaptec USB 2.0 Enclosure and put my WD 160gig drive in there. Drive was made in Jan 2004.
I had the drive attached to the computer and powered on for about 3 hours sitting idle when I got a pop-up saying "Delayed Write Failure on Drive E" and the drive was not in my drives list when I opened up My Computer.
I touched the external case and it was burning hot, not warm to the touch, but burning hot.
It's USB2. My MOBO Is a KM400-M2 ver3. I thought all USB1 has stopped a long time ago.That would be about the right speed (maybe a little slow) for a USB 1 connection
Sounds like either the port you pluged the drive into is a USB1 port as found on most any computer built more than 1.5years ago or the drivers for the port have gone funny
wuya said:It's USB2. My MOBO Is a KM400-M2 ver3. I thought all USB1 has stopped a long time ago.
How does the drivers for the port go funny?
Also, for those who had their external enclosure gone wrong. Did it do any damage to the HD itself? If so, how far did the damage go?