evga a1 to a3

M

mbradshaw

n00b
Joined
Nov 12, 2007
Messages
3
So I am a little confused as to EVGA's product numbers. What does the A1 and A3 mean? Does it mean we can overclock that one more or what? :confused: Because they didn't change the cooler on it nor the card design... Yet they are charging more...:confused:

512-P3-N802-A1
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130303

512-P3-N802-A3
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130306

Thanks for any replies I am just trying to figure out what 8800GT would be the best to get, and anyone have any good suggestions for a card or waiting for that 8800GTS which seems so far away.
 
Its the same card but a different bundled game, and newegg figures that since Crysis is in more demand they can charge more?
 
I agree Dan, i played it and the graphics were very lacking and the gameplay wasnt very interesting or new.
 
RussianHAXOR said:
I agree Dan, i played it and the graphics were very lacking and the gameplay wasnt very interesting or new.
Click to expand...

Graphics weren't ground breaking, they were decent, but they didn't exactly raise the bar. The gameplay felt awkward to me. The feel of the game was unpleasant. The game felt old, and it felt like Tribes Vengeance and Battlefield 2142 got together, had sex and then dumped their aborted fetus into a resturant dumpster, and Quake Wars was the result of this unholy union.

EA could have done this title better. Just my opinion though. :D
 
Thats exactly how i felt... it felt like an old Quake Game... not like something for 2007.
 
Dan_D said:
Graphics weren't ground breaking, they were decent, but they didn't exactly raise the bar. The gameplay felt awkward to me. The feel of the game was unpleasant. The game felt old, and it felt like Tribes Vengeance and Battlefield 2142 got together, had sex and then dumped their aborted fetus into a resturant dumpster, and Quake Wars was the result of this unholy union.

EA could have done this title better. Just my opinion though. :D
Click to expand...

I noticed though that you didn't have any complaints with it's code or stability unlike your average EA game.

I don't recall anyone ever stating that it was supposed to have ground breaking graphics either. though I will comment them for doing what DOOM 3 and Quake 4 failed on pretty badly... nice big open areas

I'd also like to know how many of you who don't like ETQW played the original RTCWET?
 
Damn, I though this would be information about the A1 to A3 cores on the chip...

You guys suck.
 
Syndicated_Death said:
I noticed though that you didn't have any complaints with it's code or stability unlike your average EA game.

I don't recall anyone ever stating that it was supposed to have ground breaking graphics either. though I will comment them for doing what DOOM 3 and Quake 4 failed on pretty badly... nice big open areas

I'd also like to know how many of you who don't like ETQW played the original RTCWET?
Click to expand...

The game was stable, and performed well. I'll give it credit where credit is due. Beyond that, I felt that the game wasn't very good. I'll take any number of other games over it any day.
 
Hazaro said:
Damn, I though this would be information about the A1 to A3 cores on the chip...

You guys suck.
Click to expand...

They aren't core differences, they are different part numbers relating to the bundled game.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top