• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Epiphany processor with 64 cores.

A

-alias-

Limp Gawd
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
374
Is this some thing we could use for folding?

http://www.hpcwire.com/hpcwire/2013-04-23/adapteva_shows_off_$99_supercomputer_boards.html
 
impressive, gflops is pretty decent, especially for the watts but pretty sure there is no ARM distribution of F@H let alone one that would take advantage of a coprocessor
 
Thanks for answer.
If this is the future of parallel computing so should certainly Stanford FAH adjust to this type of cpu also.
 
Well if it could run OpenCl then it could run core_17
Although core_17 is listed as a GPU core it is designed to run on anything that can run opencl
 
f@h would have to recognize it and support it though right? don't they have a list of devices that can use the "gpu" cores?
 
As far as I know on linux they just detect any OpenCL device and let it run on that.
 
Spazturtle said:
Well if it could run OpenCl then it could run core_17
Although core_17 is listed as a GPU core it is designed to run on anything that can run opencl
Click to expand...
While C part of Open*C*L may be universal, one would need to build (compile) a binary
targeting the platform.

Still, at 100 GFLOPS (single precision) it's pretty lousy performance for $99.

$99 GPU gets you 800 SP GFLOPS.
 
So what you are saying here is that when it comes to folding, this Epiphany 64 core processor is more of a toy to speak of?

tear said:
While C part of Open*C*L may be universal, one would need to build (compile) a binary
targeting the platform.

Still, at 100 GFLOPS (single precision) it's pretty lousy performance for $99.

$99 GPU gets you 800 SP GFLOPS.
Click to expand...
 
Too bad they didn't give the power draw off of maximum usage. That might make the difference comparing to the GPU. As far as I can tell from the article, the $99 also comes with the dual core ARM processor/Pi'ish board. Since you would only need a memory card added to it to load a full Linux or Android OS, it kinda beats the GPU Price (considering you need also the full PC and the power it consumes). So, without more info..it is just apples to oranges.
 
-alias- said:
So what you are saying here is that when it comes to folding, this Epiphany 64 core processor is more of a toy to speak of?
Click to expand...

One could state this would be a correct statement , yes?
 
tear said:
Mhm. I'm sure there are other applications of this chip that are more feasible :)
Click to expand...

Yep. Last job I did a lot of embedded programming on ARM based SBC. This one does look pretty nice. I am tempted to pick one up and jump back in.
 
402blownstroker said:
Yes in terms of folding only :)
Click to expand...

well it depends, the PPD/W could be "ok" if this only consumes a couple watts

although the practicality of the cost/gflop is probably not there
 
Anyway, I am now on the list to have one when the time's come. I think this might be one funny project to play around with, and see what it can do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top