Hi all,
I recently put together a rig featuring an EVGA 680i (A1) motherboard, an E6600 Core 2 Duo processor, a Tuniq Tower, and 2 8800 GTX graphic cards. The case is a Silverstone TJ-09 with two TriCool fans mounted on the top (in exhaust.) The fan nearest the heatsink is set on low, while the fan over the RAM is on medium. Nothing is overclocked yet. Ambient air temp varies between 19-21C.
On boot, the CMOS often reads the processor at 33-35 idle, which I suppose is average but not great. In Vista (x64 edition,) Core Temp reads a much more pleasing 23-25c (averaged between cores.) I use Vista x64 because I have four gigs of RAM, but as a result, I can't run TAT. I was wondering which reading (CMOS or CoreTemp) is more accurate, and if there is another reliable temperature gauge that works with Vista x64, so I can verify the CoreTemp reading.
Thanks,
Mark.
I recently put together a rig featuring an EVGA 680i (A1) motherboard, an E6600 Core 2 Duo processor, a Tuniq Tower, and 2 8800 GTX graphic cards. The case is a Silverstone TJ-09 with two TriCool fans mounted on the top (in exhaust.) The fan nearest the heatsink is set on low, while the fan over the RAM is on medium. Nothing is overclocked yet. Ambient air temp varies between 19-21C.
On boot, the CMOS often reads the processor at 33-35 idle, which I suppose is average but not great. In Vista (x64 edition,) Core Temp reads a much more pleasing 23-25c (averaged between cores.) I use Vista x64 because I have four gigs of RAM, but as a result, I can't run TAT. I was wondering which reading (CMOS or CoreTemp) is more accurate, and if there is another reliable temperature gauge that works with Vista x64, so I can verify the CoreTemp reading.
Thanks,
Mark.