I'm trying to figure out if this is a really bad idea or not.
Basically, I want to add a file server to my home network (2-3 machines accessing it at once, serving/recording media/data) but I want it to be expandable.
Say, I start out with a RAID5 array in software, running under linux. I have 2 questions relating to the expansion of this box (while maintaining a "flat" appearance to the users)
First: is it a bad idea to "expand" a raid5 array, as in, add a new disk to it? Will it grow like that? Or am I stuck with what I start with (say, 4x400gb disks to start, and I want to add a 5th)
Second: Say I have those same 4x400gb RAID5 disks, and want more space. But I still want it as 1 "partition" for ease of organization. Can I create ANOTHER RAID5 array (another 4x400gb, or bigger depending on what's available) and then use the linux file system to encompass BOTH of the two arrays, thus making 8 physical drives, 2RAID5 arrays, into 1 single partition?
Would the second scenario present a significant risk to my data in the event of hardware failure?
It feels very much like i'm putting all my eggs in one basket with any of these ideas (even though RAID should be somewhat fault tolerant)
Basically, I want to add a file server to my home network (2-3 machines accessing it at once, serving/recording media/data) but I want it to be expandable.
Say, I start out with a RAID5 array in software, running under linux. I have 2 questions relating to the expansion of this box (while maintaining a "flat" appearance to the users)
First: is it a bad idea to "expand" a raid5 array, as in, add a new disk to it? Will it grow like that? Or am I stuck with what I start with (say, 4x400gb disks to start, and I want to add a 5th)
Second: Say I have those same 4x400gb RAID5 disks, and want more space. But I still want it as 1 "partition" for ease of organization. Can I create ANOTHER RAID5 array (another 4x400gb, or bigger depending on what's available) and then use the linux file system to encompass BOTH of the two arrays, thus making 8 physical drives, 2RAID5 arrays, into 1 single partition?
Would the second scenario present a significant risk to my data in the event of hardware failure?
It feels very much like i'm putting all my eggs in one basket with any of these ideas (even though RAID should be somewhat fault tolerant)

