CitizenInsomniac
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- May 26, 2005
- Messages
- 134
When testing system stability, does running Prime95 at priority 9 instead of priority 8 really make a difference?
One thing I've noticed is that at priority 9 Prime95 sucks up so many CPU cycles that even the OS (Windows Vista in this case) has trouble functioning - connecting/disconnecting USB devices (mouse, keyboard) takes eternity, DWM occasionally crashes, and good luck if you forgot to disable the screen saver - you might not be able to get back to the app. My concern is that when these things happen, it's difficult to tell what's crashing due to Prime95 hogging up all the CPU cycles, as opposed to due to CPU overclocking. I'd much rather run Prime95 at priority 8, but at the same time I don't want to jeopardize the validity of the stability test.
One thing I've noticed is that at priority 9 Prime95 sucks up so many CPU cycles that even the OS (Windows Vista in this case) has trouble functioning - connecting/disconnecting USB devices (mouse, keyboard) takes eternity, DWM occasionally crashes, and good luck if you forgot to disable the screen saver - you might not be able to get back to the app. My concern is that when these things happen, it's difficult to tell what's crashing due to Prime95 hogging up all the CPU cycles, as opposed to due to CPU overclocking. I'd much rather run Prime95 at priority 8, but at the same time I don't want to jeopardize the validity of the stability test.