EQTakeOffense
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2002
- Messages
- 1,643
What is the differene between Conroe and Yonah?
FSB, Cache, and 64-Bit support....
Anything else?
FSB, Cache, and 64-Bit support....
Anything else?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought Yonah was some form of coreEva_Unit_0 said:the entire architecture?
Yonah is just like any other Pentium M chip, meaning it's a heavily modified P6 architecture (started with the Pentium pro, up through pentium 3). They're an interesting hybrid of P6 with some of the finer points of Netburst (namely the micro-op decoding and the quad-pumped bus).
Conroe (and the next mobile chip, Merom (sp?)) are based off intel's yet-unreleased Core architecture. The changes are pretty drastic: 4-issue instead of 3-issue, single cycle SSE dispatch, vastly improved SSE support in pretty much every way, etc.
Well Yonah uses the Core brand name but is still based on Pentium M technology.EnderW said:I thought Yonah was some form of core
I mean it is called Core Duo/Solo
$BangforThe$ said:Yonah is also the first shared cache arch. which makes it a hybred when comparying to a dothan single core. In this respect it is the same as merom.
Eva_Unit_0 said:yeah that's a good point. Yonah shares one thing with core, and that's the unified cache. But the real "heart" of core won't be around until merom.