Devil may cry 4 benchmarking tool.

Valset

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
6,533
pretty interesting and I haven't seen it used much here, or am I missing a reason or it just hasn't caught on here. I was pretty impressed, but I am wondering how well it follows real playing experience.
 
One thing I noticed about this tool was the fact that a few elements change every time you run it, thus the results will never be the same twice. That could be why it has not really caught on.
 
but wouldn't be a plus? you don't want "canned". that is why I was liking it. then again I don't know, but I would to see more like this
 
I ran it multiple times and the elements don't change too much to variate from good benchmarking. It's pretty consistent every time.
 
I like that program, decent game too. Unlike some other "benchmarks" it doesn't run like crap.
 
we should should start a thread of the results. I would be interested in comparing so of the newer cards to the last series.
 
I'll give my own results once I have my GTX 280 in my PC. Should happen sometime next week.

For the GTX 260 I had, I had all settings up to max w/ V-Sync & w/o any AA. Constantly maintained the 59 FPS average due to my LCD's max refresh rate @ 1920x1200.

This time around I'll do w/ & w/o the V-Sync.
 
These results are from the demo with all in game settings at maximum @ 1920x1200, nVidia Control Panel settings at default on the sig rig:

devilmaycry4trialdx1020al2.jpg


This game scales extremely well in SLI. C16xQ AA and the game is uterly crushed. I wish I liked the game better!:p
 
This game scales extremely well in SLI. C16xQ AA and the game is uterly crushed. I wish I liked the game better!:p

Same here, visually this game is very appealing, but no mouse support = fail.

BTW, can someone test this on 12x10 with 8800GT? Thanks.
 
here is mine,
1920 by 1200
C16XQ
60Hz
all settings super high
variable frame rates (I think it looks better with v-sync on though)

and I just now noticed that I doesn't let me insert a picture, how did you do that? edit, never mind, you used image shack

at any rate 61.8, 45.47, 70.4, 48.12
 
Back
Top