Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Booo I got a PM330.. PVA Called Dell earlier for a replacement, which was a painless experience. My luck sucks since it seems majority of the December 2006 units were SIPS
Plus there is awful gradient banding going on.
My PM330 shipped from Nashville, TN.
what is the lottery on the 2407? I thought they have always been PVA.
Check this:
http://www.dellcommunity.com/supportforums/board/message?board.id=dim_monitor&message.id=73410#M73410
Dell ChrisM:
2407WFP
Response time: 6ms (grey to grey) 16ms (black to white)
Panel type: S-IPS, S-PVA
Current revision: A04
Well.. they're both here...they're both RT803 S-IPS... they both have that characteristic purplish hue when you look at it from the side... and they are both incredible
Keep on trying for those S-IPS screens if you haven't gotten one. You WILL get one and it WILL be worth it.
My only complaint, and this isn't really the monitor's fault, is that while DVI mode looks great, VGA mode looks terrible. I'll need to get a dual DVI card just to make use of these puppies.
Check this:
http://www.dellcommunity.com/supportforums/board/message?board.id=dim_monitor&message.id=73410#M73410
Response time: 6ms (grey to grey) 16ms (black to white)
Panel type: S-IPS, S-PVA
Current revision: A04
It's curious to see that the people who've ordered from Samsclub have all gotten S-IPS screens. Does anyone know if these are A03? I'm really starting to doubt that any S-IPS screens can come from the TN factory now...
I put in for my second switch but I am not hopefull.
Just about the only point I'll concede on is gaming, but even though it is not as fast as the TN panels, it's a lot faster than the S-PVA or P-MVA panels since it does not have input lag. And if you wanna talk about TN panels? Oh yeah, definitely the 2007WFP takes the cake in color accuracy there. They can't even do 16.7 million colors, let alone the fact that they have pathetic viewing angles.2007WFP is NOT good for people who have anything to do with computer graphics. Reason: Screen coating produces a clearly visible sand-like layer, which is very efficient at distorting image and color quality. For example, when you are a photographer and doing some digital photo enhancements, you can never know if the granularity you see on somebody's face is the effect of monitor or the photo itself. So you will never be able to see on this monitor the real result of your work.
2007WFP is NOT good for anybody who uses computer to read anything. Text is significantly blurry. Your eyes will get blind very soon. In this case again the screen coating has to do with blurry effect. To describe what you see on the screen, try imagining that somebody mixed small size grains of sand with very small grains of flashy cristals, and then spilled this mixture on the entire area of the screen. This creates the effect of flickering, comparable to 70 hz refresh rate on CRT monitors. Additionally when you enable ClearType, then all letters will not look black anymore, only some kind of greyish.
2007WFP is NOT good for anybody who wants to watch a movie from a close distance. Again screen coating is very visible.
2007WFP is NOT so good for game players either. Simply because it's not as fast as cheaper TN panels.