![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
[deleted]
- Thread starter [H]exx
- Start date
- Status
It probably has to do with the competition that Google and Microsoft are supposedly in. They are assuming that the company that perfects on-line office application first will be in position to profit from the long predicted web-based thin-client approach.
Of all the companies out there, more people have faith that Google can come up with a decent competitor to MS Office than anybody else. O
rg is great, no doubts, but it does not have the corporate recongnition that google does, which means people aren't as likely to build their products to take advantage of it.
Example: I have a software application we use here at work that *requires* ms office. oo.org just won't work. If these vendors decide they like google better, I'd be a happy camper.
rg is great, no doubts, but it does not have the corporate recongnition that google does, which means people aren't as likely to build their products to take advantage of it. Example: I have a software application we use here at work that *requires* ms office. oo.org just won't work. If these vendors decide they like google better, I'd be a happy camper.
- Status