Decent 3dMark 2k11 score for a gtx 680?

G

geforce man

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
1,155
I have a Galaxy GTX 680, and finally decided to push it a bit.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/7384040

Is that decent? Stayed boosted to 1319Mhz core for 95% of the benchmark, and dropped a bin or two down when it hit 72c (fan was maxed out @ 85% with MSI Afterburner).

System is: i7 2700k @ 4600Mhz, 16gb ram @ 1866 9-9-9-24-1t, p67 motherboard, 2gb Galaxy GTX 680.

Thanks!

Also: Asic Quality - 82.3%, and this is the reference design. Card was run @ +200Mhz core, +400Mhz mem (6800), and +132% power (maxed out)
 
I guess its a good result... This are my 3dmark11 score .. are very close in Graphic Test.. but you have way better physics and combined results due to your overclocked chip... im running single 660TI ATM.. at +80clock (1380mhz) and +500memory (7ghz). and +150% power limit...
 
Who cares, seriously.

I don't know where this sudden resurgence of people giving a shit about 3Dmark scores came from but it needs to go away :p
 
runudownquick said:
You're telling me your 660Ti runs at 1300 Mhz STOCK? Or is that a typo?...
Click to expand...

stock.. my died card ran at 1333mhz stock, overclocked both can go over 1400mhz and 7200mhz memory. Pic that was my max reached on that card, on my actually card at 1400mhz crash on 3dmark. but run good at other bench and gaming.
 
Araxie said:
I guess its a good result... This are my 3dmark11 score .. are very close in Graphic Test.. but you have way better physics and combined results due to your overclocked chip... im running single 660TI ATM.. at +80clock (1380mhz) and +500memory (7ghz). and +150% power limit...
Click to expand...

Your score is incredibly inflated due to the misreporting of Graphic Test 3 (8240.9 fps), caused by the incompatible graphics driver (which also caused the result to be invalid)
 
Reality said:
Your score is incredibly inflated due to the misreporting of Graphic Test 3 (8240.9 fps), caused by the incompatible graphics driver (which also caused the result to be invalid)
Click to expand...

I thought something looked skewed overall, didn't see the uber fps. Nice catch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top