![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
Current 24"+ LCD Specification Comparison Chart
- Thread starter beelzibub
- Start date
Thanks for the links RB30, this is an interesting discussion 
This would make sense, and ultimately make things a bit easier. I remember though that the V0 panel was listed as being P-MVA on AUO's website....
Will have a read through those links too cheers
that was the main thing which made this confusing...if panel specs matched, it would be a much more clear cut case.
could be a mixture of V0, V2 and V4 panels I guess. Best thing to say if asked would be that it uses an AUO M240UW01 MVA panel I guess! haha, would solve a lot of problems!
yeah this was the thing. specs are out. Regarding the backlighting though, Behardware saw 12 CCFL's in this review, so perhaps the V2 is correct after all. V4 only has 6 CCFL's listed on AUO's site....wow, this is confusing!
This would make sense, and ultimately make things a bit easier. I remember though that the V0 panel was listed as being P-MVA on AUO's website....
Will have a read through those links too
cheersthat was the main thing which made this confusing...if panel specs matched, it would be a much more clear cut case.
could be a mixture of V0, V2 and V4 panels I guess. Best thing to say if asked would be that it uses an AUO M240UW01 MVA panel I guess! haha, would solve a lot of problems!
yeah this was the thing. specs are out. Regarding the backlighting though, Behardware saw 12 CCFL's in this review, so perhaps the V2 is correct after all. V4 only has 6 CCFL's listed on AUO's site....wow, this is confusing!
Where in the Behardware review said WZ uses 12 CCFL?
Also this review is an early review (advanced preview model because WZ hasn't gone into production at that time) which also claimed that WZ uses non-AUO PVA (which has been disproved by Chinese website disassembly of a WZ):
http://www.behardware.com/articles/646-4/benq-fp241wz-1rst-lcd-with-screening.html
This is probably the review that started whole confusion spreading around WWW about WZ uses non-AUO PVA.
more early discussion more confusion: http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=8622211&postcount=631
yeah, BeHardware's discussion of Samsung S-PVA didn't help matters...and sorry, i meant to say BH review says 16 CCFL's:
(bottom of first page)
Oh, crap! This is more confusing because it seems like 16 neons were referring to Samsung's LE40M73BD in the mid-page.
http://www.behardware.com/articles/641-1/1er-lcd-100-hz-mort-remanence.html
yeah it is a little bit of a mess. We know BH had a very early pre-production model though, so things could have changed. Xbitlabs also mention 16 CCFL's for the FP241WZ in this article, but then again, it is linked back to BH from there. Hmmn,
16 backlight lamps (as opposed to 12 CCFLs in the V2)?
that's the suggestion i guess....meaning the v2 specs are again out!
BH was referring to their reviewed WZ unit has Samsung panel, so it could just simply mean that Samsung's panel indeed has 16 backlighting neons so it has nothing to do with V2 specs.
One thing is still bugging me is the fact that the WZ units BH reviewed and that Chinese website dissected were all done around December 2006, and there were 2 different panels inside??? Or could it just mean that BH had never actually opened one up and was speculating.
BenQ have said the BH version was a pre-production model, there's no mention in their review that they opened it up, and i doubt they would have tbh. I guess the Samsung vs AUO thing was just an assumption they made? It's an odd situation for sure, I'm seeing if i can get any clarification from BenQ as well