CS Source Rocks!!

[NickN]

BF2 is too easy IMO

I agree. In CS, everything is up close, and when two hostile people meet up, it's 100% sure that one of them is going to die. In the Battlefield games (even in the relatively small maps) you have the luxury of sitting back and firing well-placed shots at your enemy from afar, sometimes even where they can't find you. I tend to get higher scores in BF games than in CS for that exact reason.

 

[Glow]

well my favorite CS was beta 7.1 as for game play. But I mean seriously. This game looks beautiful. And since I can play it at Native 1680x1050 w/ 4x AA and 8x AF.. it really loooks good. I always loved CS save for the damn hax0rs. But what can you do. No other game "feels" like CS... and it will always be my favorite FPS.

7.1 same my fav too, before they made new stupid models

 

[Pvt. Potter]

Try playing maps in close quarters. laby_glass in particular you can easily rip apart the other team, oh lord that's so ridiculous...Just because you haven't seen it makes it impossible huh? Think a bit more..

genius... you said at once... i doubt you could take on 20 AT ONCE without dying... there's just no way that 20 people can suck that bad. Even 3 year olds mashing randomly on mouse and keyboard would get shots in and kill you. Sure... if you could fight just 2 or 3 max AT ONCE, then you may be able to take 20...

 

[perplex]

someone just said they removed shield in Source? well wow why the hell dont Valve remove it from 1.6 FIRST? please!!!!

 

[roninblade]

someone just said they removed shield in Source? well wow why the hell dont Valve remove it from 1.6 FIRST? please!!!!

Because Valve has like 3 employes seriously they do not listen to the community, thats why they setup the forums so ppl could do their shit for them. Look how long it takes for them to develop games.

 

[Mabrito]

Because Valve has like 3 employes seriously they do not listen to the community, thats why they setup the forums so ppl could do their shit for them. Look how long it takes for them to develop games.

You sir are a idiot!!!!

Where the hell did Valve doesnt listen to the community come from?

They take a while to develop games because they make sure the game is worthy enough to come out. Sure Half-Life 2 was delayed a year. If it came out that year it was suppose to, Half-Life 2 would be totally diffrent. It would of been buggy, probably levels would of been cut. Valve just has a hard time when it comes to release dates. When Half-Life 2 finally did come out, it hardly had any noticable bugs. And a week later there was a huge bug fix already.The community wanted a Half-Life 2 deathmatch. We got a Half-Life 2 deathmatch.

Out of any creator out there, they actually listen to what people have to say on the forums. You go there, and say if someone has a really good idea, theres a good chance a Valve employee would post in it.

There the only creator out there that have weekly updates on what they are doing.

Valve may be small, but what they lack in quantity they make up in quality. Valve is full with talented people, who do a really good job, and arnt in the buisness for the big bucks.

If it wasnt for Valve, I dont think games would be where they are today. There physics engine in Half-Life 2 probably started a new craze for developers. The Source engine is a really good engine. Graphics are really nice, physics are outstanding, and its like the only engine out there that looks so good and can run on pretty old hardware.

Have some respect to Valve, and do not post that crap. Its not true and you know it.

 

[MantisIT]

genius... you said at once... i doubt you could take on 20 AT ONCE without dying... there's just no way that 20 people can suck that bad. Even 3 year olds mashing randomly on mouse and keyboard would get shots in and kill you. Sure... if you could fight just 2 or 3 max AT ONCE, then you may be able to take 20...

Yeah, I have and I'm sure plenty of people did too. It's called killing spree's and I've done it before. All I can say is that yes I've wiped out a ton of people and if I have to record a session just to get you to stop posting like you know what you're talking about,then I'll do it. It's one thing not to believe someone but, to make a statement like "NO THAT CAN'T HAPPEN" is bull, you know damn well that's possible, you probably just couldn't do it.

 

[Brando457]

genius... you said at once... i doubt you could take on 20 AT ONCE without dying... there's just no way that 20 people can suck that bad. Even 3 year olds mashing randomly on mouse and keyboard would get shots in and kill you. Sure... if you could fight just 2 or 3 max AT ONCE, then you may be able to take 20...

you're anidiot it is VERY possible go watch someone who is CAL-0 or just using a machine gun or noob cannon on any close quarters maps as ppl have mentioned for example ke_glass you can kill 20 ppl easily with a machine gun.

you lose i win

 

[finalgt]

you're a fucking idiot it is VERY possible go watch someone who is CAL-0 or just using a machine gun or noob cannon on any close quarters maps as ppl have mentioned for example ke_glass you can kill 20 ppl easily with a machine gun.

Sorry, but you just got NooB cannoned up ur ass owned

(1) Absolutely NO FLAMING OR NAME CALLING. Mutual respect and civilized conversation is the required norm.

And your argument isn't even good, either. Chill the fuck out.

 

[Brando457]

(1) Absolutely NO FLAMING OR NAME CALLING. Mutual respect and civilized conversation is the required norm.

And your argument isn't even good, either. Chill the fuck out.

Tell them I said suck my dick

 

[Lethal]

Tell them I said suck my dick

Anyone else want a vacation?