I recently replaced my CRT (Viewsonic G90fb) with my first LCD display (a HP LP2475w) and am very happy with the HP in general. Aside from the 3 or 4 stuck pixels, theres only one small thing thats nagging at me: items that should have identical aspect ratios on the old 4:3 Viewsonic and the new 16:10 HP do not. Everything looks slightly stretched in the vertical direction on the HP and Im trying to figure out why.
For example, the My Documents icon on the Windows XP desktop is 69 pixels wide and 47 pixels high on the HP, for a theoretical aspect ratio of 1.468. Actually measuring it with a ruler, I got 1.461 for the aspect ratio, meaning (correct me if Im wrong) that the HPs pixels are perfectly square about as far as can be determined by hand. However, the same icon, measured in the same way, has an aspect ratio of 1.58, at both 800x600 and 1280x960 (4:3) resolutions on the Viewsonic. Why would this be the case? Is there some simple explanation, such as nonsquare pixels in the CRT? Are Viewsonics of that vintage known to have some particular pixel aspect ratio other than 1:1?
For example, the My Documents icon on the Windows XP desktop is 69 pixels wide and 47 pixels high on the HP, for a theoretical aspect ratio of 1.468. Actually measuring it with a ruler, I got 1.461 for the aspect ratio, meaning (correct me if Im wrong) that the HPs pixels are perfectly square about as far as can be determined by hand. However, the same icon, measured in the same way, has an aspect ratio of 1.58, at both 800x600 and 1280x960 (4:3) resolutions on the Viewsonic. Why would this be the case? Is there some simple explanation, such as nonsquare pixels in the CRT? Are Viewsonics of that vintage known to have some particular pixel aspect ratio other than 1:1?