SquadBumrush
n00b
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2009
- Messages
- 14
Hey gang!
Just wondering if someone can offer some clarification between these two measurement types. I'm overclocking an i5-750 using various monitoring/benchmarking/stressing tools (OCCT, Sandra, Everest, etc.) and it's unclear to me exactly how these measurements factor into overclocking stability.
For example, Everest reports CPU temperatures using a singular value and per-core values.
The singular value is typically much lower (~5-10 degrees) that the highest individual core temperature. So low, in general, that it is unlikely that this value is the average/median/mean of the 4 individual cores. Perhaps this is actually the ambient temp?
Intel's whitepaper on the i5-750 states that maximum "normal" operating temperature is 72.7 degrees Celsius. Does this actually mean the maximum of the highest individual core temperature?
Thanks!
Just wondering if someone can offer some clarification between these two measurement types. I'm overclocking an i5-750 using various monitoring/benchmarking/stressing tools (OCCT, Sandra, Everest, etc.) and it's unclear to me exactly how these measurements factor into overclocking stability.
For example, Everest reports CPU temperatures using a singular value and per-core values.
The singular value is typically much lower (~5-10 degrees) that the highest individual core temperature. So low, in general, that it is unlikely that this value is the average/median/mean of the 4 individual cores. Perhaps this is actually the ambient temp?
Intel's whitepaper on the i5-750 states that maximum "normal" operating temperature is 72.7 degrees Celsius. Does this actually mean the maximum of the highest individual core temperature?
Thanks!