So I've got my Q6600 G0 up and running and at the moment it's stable at 2801mhz. I've set the BIOS at 1.25v but here's my catch. I've been running two instances of Orthos, one attached to CPU0 and CPU1. The other attached to CPU2 and CPU3. This has now been running for 9 hours this way.
According to CPU-Z I am at 2801mhz and 1.200v.
According to Speedfan I am at 53C CPU, CPU 0-34C, CPU 1-33C, CPU 2-32C, CPU 3-32C
SpeedFan also reports that the CPU is running at 1.200v
According to Core Temp I am at 100C Tjunction, Core 0-49C, Core 1-48C, Core 2-47C, Core 3-47C.
Also according to Core Temp I am at 1.215v
The question is, which one is accurate? I am inclined to believe that Speed Fan is most accurate, especially given that Core Temp not yet at a full version thus the kinks haven't been worked out completely. I am also hesitant to believe that this CPU has been working above it's safe rated temps for 9 hours without rebooting or something to that effect.
According to CPU-Z I am at 2801mhz and 1.200v.
According to Speedfan I am at 53C CPU, CPU 0-34C, CPU 1-33C, CPU 2-32C, CPU 3-32C
SpeedFan also reports that the CPU is running at 1.200v
According to Core Temp I am at 100C Tjunction, Core 0-49C, Core 1-48C, Core 2-47C, Core 3-47C.
Also according to Core Temp I am at 1.215v
The question is, which one is accurate? I am inclined to believe that Speed Fan is most accurate, especially given that Core Temp not yet at a full version thus the kinks haven't been worked out completely. I am also hesitant to believe that this CPU has been working above it's safe rated temps for 9 hours without rebooting or something to that effect.